• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唇腭裂双胞胎的颅面形态学

Craniofacial morphology in twins with cleft lip and palate.

作者信息

Laatikainen T, Ranta R, Nordström R

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Orthodontics, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Mar;33(2):96-103. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0096_cmitwc_2.3.co_2.

DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0096_cmitwc_2.3.co_2
PMID:8695628
Abstract

The craniofacial morphology of 11 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) and 28 pairs of dizygotic (DZ) Finnish twins, discordant or concordant for cleft of the lip (CL), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), or cleft palate only (CP) were investigated by means of lateral cephalometric radiographs. The results were compared to those of age-, sex-, and cleft-type matched single-birth cleft subjects, and also with normative data from the Nordic population. The co-twins with no cleft lip or palate (NONC) showed only slightly more obtuse gonial and steeper mandibular angles compared to normative data. Twins with CL, UCLP or CP had a more retrusive mandible, a wider cranial base and mandibular angle, and a wider angle between the maxilla and mandible than did the single-birth cleft subjects. Comparison of the noncleft twin group with the CL, UCLP, and CP twin groups for the CL twins showed no significant differences. For the UCLP twins, a more retrusive and down- and backward rotation of both jaws, a wider gonial angle, and a wider cranial base angle was seen. The CP twins had their maxillae slightly retrusive, the down- and backward rotation of both jaws was apparent, and the gonial angle was more obtuse. A comparison between the noncleft MZ and noncleft CDZ twins showed no significant differences. The MZ CP twins had a more retrusive mandible and more down- and backward rotation of both jaws than did DZ CP twins. It thus can be suggested that twinning itself does not seem to have an effect on maxillofacial morphology, but the features of the mandibular structure, the cranial base angulation, and the inclination of the jaws are at least partly genetically induced.

摘要

通过头颅侧位X线片对11对单卵(MZ)和28对双卵(DZ)芬兰双胞胎的颅面形态进行了研究,这些双胞胎在唇裂(CL)、单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)或仅腭裂(CP)方面存在不一致或一致的情况。将结果与年龄、性别和腭裂类型匹配的单胎腭裂患者的结果进行比较,同时也与北欧人群的正常数据进行比较。未患唇腭裂的双胞胎(NONC)与正常数据相比,仅表现出下颌角稍钝和下颌角更陡。与单胎腭裂患者相比,患有CL、UCLP或CP的双胞胎下颌更后缩,颅底和下颌角更宽,上颌与下颌之间的角度更宽。将非腭裂双胞胎组与CL、UCLP和CP双胞胎组进行比较,CL双胞胎组未显示出显著差异。对于UCLP双胞胎,观察到上下颌均更后缩且向下和向后旋转,下颌角更宽,颅底角更宽。CP双胞胎的上颌稍向后缩,上下颌向下和向后旋转明显,下颌角更钝。非腭裂MZ双胞胎和非腭裂CDZ双胞胎之间的比较未显示出显著差异。MZ CP双胞胎比DZ CP双胞胎下颌更后缩,上下颌向下和向后旋转更多。因此可以认为,双胞胎本身似乎对颌面形态没有影响,但下颌结构、颅底角度和颌骨倾斜度的特征至少部分是由遗传因素引起的。

相似文献

1
Craniofacial morphology in twins with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂双胞胎的颅面形态学
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Mar;33(2):96-103. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0096_cmitwc_2.3.co_2.
2
Etiological aspects on craniofacial morphology in twins with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂双胞胎颅面形态的病因学方面
Eur J Oral Sci. 1999 Apr;107(2):102-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107205.x.
3
Craniofacial morphology in twins discordant for cleft lip and/or palate.唇腭裂不一致的双胞胎的颅面形态。
Cleft Palate J. 1980 Apr;17(2):116-26.
4
Cleft-twin sets in Finland 1948-1987.1948 - 1987年芬兰的裂腹双胎病例集
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jul;33(4):340-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0340_ctsif_2.3.co_2.
5
Analyses of craniofacial and dental morphology in monozygotic twins discordant for cleft lip and unilateral cleft lip and palate.对唇裂及单侧唇腭裂单卵双胞胎的颅面和牙齿形态分析。
Angle Orthod. 1993 Summer;63(2):135-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0135:AOCADM>2.0.CO;2.
6
Morphometric analysis of craniofacial features in mono- and dizygotic twins discordant for unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂的单卵双生子和双卵双生子颅面特征的形态计量学分析。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):878-83. doi: 10.2319/121710-725.1. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
7
Dental age and asymmetry in the formation of mandibular teeth in twins concordant or discordant for oral clefts.唇腭裂一致或不一致的双胞胎下颌牙齿形成过程中的牙龄与不对称性。
Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Oct;96(5):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01573.x.
8
Exploration of genetic factors determining cleft side in a pair of monozygotic twins with mirror-image cleft lip and palate using whole-genome sequencing and comparison of craniofacial morphology.应用全基因组测序和颅面形态比较分析一对镜像唇腭裂同卵双胞胎中决定裂隙侧的遗传因素。
Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Dec;96:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
9
[Craniofacial morphology of parents with cleft lip and palate children].[唇腭裂患儿父母的颅面形态]
Shikwa Gakuho. 1989 Sep;89(9):1479-506.
10
Comparison of craniofacial and dentoalveolar morphologies of three Japanese monozygotic twin pairs with cleft lip and/or palate discordancy.三对唇腭裂不一致的日本单卵双胞胎的颅面和牙槽形态比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998 Mar;35(2):173-80. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569-35.2.173.

引用本文的文献

1
What's Shape Got to Do With It? Examining the Relationship Between Facial Shape and Orofacial Clefting.形状与之有何关系?探究面部形状与口面部裂隙之间的关系。
Front Genet. 2022 May 3;13:891502. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.891502. eCollection 2022.
2
Testing the face shape hypothesis in twins discordant for nonsyndromic orofacial clefting.在非综合征性口面部裂隙不一致的双胞胎中检验面部形状假说。
Am J Med Genet A. 2017 Nov;173(11):2886-2892. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38471. Epub 2017 Sep 8.