Suppr超能文献

[肠内营养和肠外营养诱导的二氧化碳产生及产热]

[CO2 production and thermogenesis induced by enteral and parenteral nutrition].

作者信息

Raurich J M, Ibáñez J, Marsé P

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, España.

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):108-13.

PMID:8695706
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The objectives of this study were to quantify, in critically ill patients, the thermogenesis induced by artificial nutrition (AN), when the caloric supply restores the energetic losses, and to evaluate the effects of the AN suppression on the production of CO2 (VCO2).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

20 patients were studied, 14 with mechanical ventilation and 6 with spontaneous respiration, divided into two groups, depending on whether the AN was enteral (EN) or parenteral (PN). The VCO2 and the consumption of oxygen (VO2) were measured by means of the Douglas bag. The resting energy expenditure during the AN (REET) and 2 hours after discontinuing the AN (REE) were measured. The thermogenesis induced by the nutrition (TIN) was defined as the difference between REET and REE, expressed as a percentage of the caloric supply.

RESULTS

After discontinuing the AN, there were no statistically significant differences between EN and PN patients in the VCO2 decreases (p = 0.60) and the VO2 decreases (p = 0.78), and in the TIN percentage referred to the caloric supply (p = 0.82). After discontinuing the caloric supply, which was 1.12 times the REET, the VCO2 decreased 5 +/- 4.9% (Confidence interval (CI) of 95%, from 3% to 7%), the VO2 decreased 2 +/- 6.1% (CI of -0.36% to 5.32%), and the TIN represented 3 +/- 4.5% of the caloric supply (CI of 0.72% to 4.95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the thermogenesis induced by artificial nutrition, when restores the energetic losses, is equivalent to 3% of the caloric supply. The discontinuation of the artificial nutrition induced a VCO2 decrease of 5% and thus this measure would probably not be useful for decreasing the ventilatory demand.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是在重症患者中,量化当热量供应恢复能量损失时人工营养(AN)诱导的产热,并评估停用AN对二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)的影响。

材料与方法

研究了20例患者,14例接受机械通气,6例自主呼吸,根据AN是肠内营养(EN)还是肠外营养(PN)分为两组。通过道格拉斯袋测量VCO2和氧气消耗量(VO2)。测量了AN期间的静息能量消耗(REET)和停用AN后2小时的静息能量消耗(REE)。营养诱导的产热(TIN)定义为REET与REE之间的差值,以热量供应的百分比表示。

结果

停用AN后,EN组和PN组患者在VCO2降低(p = 0.60)、VO2降低(p = 0.78)以及热量供应相关的TIN百分比(p = 0.82)方面均无统计学显著差异。在停用为REET的1.12倍的热量供应后,VCO2降低了5±4.9%(95%置信区间(CI),从3%到7%),VO2降低了2±6.1%(CI为 -0.36%到5.32%),TIN占热量供应的3±4.5%(CI为0.72%到4.95%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,当恢复能量损失时,人工营养诱导的产热相当于热量供应的3%。停用人工营养导致VCO2降低5%,因此该措施可能对降低通气需求无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验