Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(SCID)在药物滥用患者中的效度。

Validity of the SCID in substance abuse patients.

作者信息

Kranzler H R, Kadden R M, Babor T F, Tennen H, Rounsaville B J

机构信息

Alcohol Research Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 1996 Jun;91(6):859-68.

PMID:8696248
Abstract

Structured or semi-structured interviews, including the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), are used widely to maximize the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses. Although the reliability of such interviews appears adequate, there has been little effort to evaluate their validity. In a sample of 100 substance abuse patients, we evaluated the concurrent, discriminant and predictive validity of SCID substance use diagnoses, as well as co-morbid disorders that occur commonly among these patients. The validity of current and life-time substance use diagnoses obtained by a research technician using the SCID was good; it was moderate for antisocial personality disorder and major depression and poor for anxiety disorders. Although accurate diagnosis of substance use disorders in substance abuse patients can be accomplished by a research technician, the diagnosis of co-morbid psychiatric disorders requires either additional expertise or the use of a diagnostic instrument specially designed for that purpose.

摘要

结构化或半结构化访谈,包括《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》结构化临床访谈(SCID),被广泛用于最大化精神科诊断的可靠性和有效性。尽管此类访谈的可靠性似乎足够,但几乎没有进行过评估其有效性的工作。在100名药物滥用患者的样本中,我们评估了SCID药物使用诊断的同时效度、区分效度和预测效度,以及这些患者中常见的共病障碍。由研究技术员使用SCID得出的当前和终生药物使用诊断的效度良好;反社会人格障碍和重度抑郁症的效度中等,焦虑症的效度较差。尽管研究技术员可以准确诊断药物滥用患者的药物使用障碍,但共病精神障碍的诊断需要额外的专业知识或为此目的专门设计的诊断工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验