Eék Niels, Sundström Christopher, Kraepelien Martin, Lundgren Jesper, Kaldo Viktor, Berman Anne H
University of Gothenburg, Department of Psychology, Sweden.
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Internet Interv. 2023 May 24;33:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100630. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) are widespread and have serious consequences, but are among the most undertreated mental disorders. Internet interventions have been found effective in treating AUD, but we know little about long-term outcomes, two years or more after treatment. This study explored 12- and 24-month outcomes in alcohol consumption following initial 6-month improvements after a therapist-guided high-intensity internet intervention and an unguided low-intensity internet intervention among individuals with alcohol use disorder. Between-group comparisons were analyzed, as well as within-group comparisons with (1) pre-treatment measurements (2) post-treatment measurements. Participants consisted of a general population sample of internet help-seekers in Sweden. A total of 143 adults (47% men) with a score of 14 (women)/16 (men) or more on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, alcohol consumption of 11 (women)/14 (men) or more standard drinks the preceding week and ≥ 2 DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria based on a diagnostic interview were included. The high- and low-intensity internet interventions ( = 72 and = 71 respectively) consisted of modules based on relapse prevention and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The primary outcome was self-reported alcohol consumption in the preceding week measured as (1) number of standard drinks and (2) number of heavy drinking days. Attrition from self-reported questionnaires was 36% at the 12-month follow-up and 53% at the 24-month follow-up. No significant between-group differences occurred in outcomes at either long-term follow-up. Regarding within-group differences, compared to pre-treatment, alcohol consumption was lower in both high- and low-intensity interventions at both long-term follow-ups [within-group standard drinks effect sizes varied between = 0.38-1.04 and heavy drinking days effect sizes varied between = 0.65-0.94]. Compared to post-treatment, within-group alcohol consumption in the high intensity intervention increased at both follow-ups; for the low-intensity intervention, within-group consumption decreased at 12-month follow-up, but did not differ compared to post-treatment at 24 months. Both high- and low-intensity internet interventions for AUD were thus associated with overall reductions in alcohol consumption at long term follow-ups, with no significant differences between the two. However, conclusions are hampered by differential and non-differential attrition.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)普遍存在且后果严重,但却是治疗最不充分的精神障碍之一。已发现互联网干预对治疗AUD有效,但对于治疗两年或更长时间后的长期效果,我们了解甚少。本研究探讨了在有酒精使用障碍的个体中,经过治疗师指导的高强度互联网干预和无指导的低强度互联网干预后,最初6个月病情改善后12个月和24个月的饮酒结果。分析了组间比较以及组内与(1)治疗前测量值(2)治疗后测量值的比较。参与者包括瑞典互联网求助者的一般人群样本。共有143名成年人(47%为男性)纳入研究,他们在酒精使用障碍识别测试中的得分达到14分(女性)/16分(男性)及以上,前一周饮酒量达到11杯(女性)/14杯(男性)及以上标准饮品,且基于诊断访谈符合≥2条DSM-5酒精使用障碍(AUD)标准。高强度和低强度互联网干预(分别为n = 72和n = 71)均由基于预防复发和认知行为疗法的模块组成。主要结局指标是自报的前一周饮酒量,以(1)标准饮品数量和(2)重度饮酒天数来衡量。在12个月随访时,自报问卷的失访率为36%,在24个月随访时为53%。在任何一个长期随访中,组间结局均未出现显著差异。关于组内差异,与治疗前相比,高强度和低强度干预在两个长期随访中饮酒量均较低[组内标准饮品效应量在r = 0.38 - 1.04之间,重度饮酒天数效应量在r = 0.65 - 0.94之间]。与治疗后相比,高强度干预在两个随访中组内饮酒量均增加;对于低强度干预,在12个月随访时组内饮酒量下降,但在24个月时与治疗后相比无差异。因此,针对AUD的高强度和低强度互联网干预在长期随访中均与饮酒量总体减少相关,两者之间无显著差异。然而,不同的失访率和非失访率影响了研究结论。