Suppr超能文献

多中心随机试验:比较顺铂-丝裂霉素-长春瑞滨与顺铂-丝裂霉素-长春地辛治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌。“法国肺癌研究小组”

Multicenter randomized trial comparing cisplatin-mitomycin-vinorelbine versus cisplatin-mitomycin-vindesine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 'Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie'.

作者信息

Pérol M, Guérin J C, Thomas P, Poirier R, Carles P, Robinet G, Kleisbauer J P, Paillotin D, Vergnenègre A, Balmes P, Touron D, Grivaux M, Pham E

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 1996 Feb;14(1):119-34. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00517-x.

Abstract

The study was designed to evaluate the value of vinorelbine in a cisplatin-mitomycin-vinca alkaloid regimen for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A group of 227 patients with inoperable NSCLC in stage III (58%) or stage IV (42%) were included in this randomized multicenter trial comparing a reference regimen (VDS group, n = 113) cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1, day 29 and day 71), mitomycin (8 mg/m2 on day 1, day 29 and day 71) and vindesine (3 mg/m2/week for 5 weeks and then every 2 weeks up to the 15th week) to a cisplatin-mitomycin-vinorelbine combination (VNB group, n = 114), with cisplatin and mitomycin at the same doses, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/week for 16 weeks. The objective response rate (evaluated at 17th week) was 17% in the VDS group and 25% in the VNB group (P = 0.15). Median survival was 33.4 weeks and 34.5 weeks in the VDS and VNB arms, respectively. Overall survival duration was not significantly different between the two arms (logrank test, P = 0.20) despite a trend to an increased survival in the VNB group. This essentially benefited the patients with stage III disease with a clear-cut lengthening of median (45.9 vs. 33.4 weeks) and 1 year survival (44.6% vs. 26.2%, P < 0.05) in favor of the VNB group. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in overall survival (logrank, P = 0.13). Survival duration of the patients with stage IV disease was comparable in the two arms (logrank test, P = 0.90). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was found in 61% and 87% of the VDS and VNB groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Grade 2-4 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 23% of the patients in the VDS group and in 6% of the patients in the VNB group (P < 0.01). Replacement of vindesine by vinorelbine in a cisplatin-mitomycin-vinca alkaloid chemotherapeutic regimen did not lead to a significant improvement in objective response rate or in duration of survival. There was a reduction in neurotoxicity at the expense of an increased hematologic toxicity. However, for patients with stage III disease there was an increase in 1 year survival with the vinorelbine combination.

摘要

本研究旨在评估长春瑞滨在顺铂-丝裂霉素-长春花生物碱方案中用于治疗局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的价值。在这项随机多中心试验中,纳入了一组227例无法手术的NSCLC患者,其中III期患者占58%,IV期患者占42%。该试验比较了一个参考方案(VDS组,n = 113):顺铂(第1天、第29天和第71天,120 mg/m²)、丝裂霉素(第1天、第29天和第71天,8 mg/m²)和长春地辛(第1周每周3 mg/m²,共5周,然后每2周一次,直至第15周)与顺铂-丝裂霉素-长春瑞滨联合方案(VNB组,n = 114),顺铂和丝裂霉素剂量相同,长春瑞滨25 mg/m²/周,共16周。(在第17周评估的)客观缓解率在VDS组为17%,在VNB组为25%(P = 0.15)。VDS组和VNB组的中位生存期分别为33.4周和34.5周。尽管VNB组有生存增加的趋势,但两组的总生存期无显著差异(对数秩检验,P = 0.20)。这对III期疾病患者尤为有益,VNB组的中位生存期(45.9周对33.4周)和1年生存率(44.6%对26.2%,P < 0.05)明显延长。然而,总生存期仍无显著差异(对数秩检验,P = 0.13)。IV期疾病患者在两组中的生存期相当(对数秩检验,P = 0.90)。VDS组和VNB组分别有61%和87%的患者出现≥3级中性粒细胞减少(P < 0.01)。VDS组23%的患者和VNB组6%的患者观察到2-4级周围神经病变(P < 0.01)。在顺铂-丝裂霉素-长春花生物碱化疗方案中用长春瑞滨替代长春地辛,并未导致客观缓解率或生存期的显著改善。神经毒性有所降低,但血液学毒性增加。然而,对于III期疾病患者,长春瑞滨联合方案使1年生存率有所提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验