Taves D H, McCurdy L I, Sparrow R K
Department of Radiology, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ont.
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1996 Aug;47(4):257-9.
To determine the relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination.
Data from the first 3.5 years of operation of the Ontario Breast Screening Program's regional facility in London were analyzed. A total of 14,646 women underwent screening, which involved both mammography and physical examination. The authors examined the relative contribution of the two types of examination according to detection rate, as well as size, stage and histologic type of the identified breast cancers.
In total, 135 cancers were detected. Mammography revealed 131 (97.0%) of all cancers, whereas physical examination revealed only 66 (48.9%). Furthermore, the lesions detected by mammography were generally smaller and found at an earlier stage.
Although most other screening programs involve mammography only, physical examination did make a contribution to the detection rate at the authors' facility. However, in an era of declining resources and cost containment, critical analysis of the value added by physical examination is necessary.
确定乳腺钼靶筛查和体格检查的相对诊断影响。
对安大略省乳腺筛查项目伦敦地区机构运营的前3.5年的数据进行分析。共有14646名女性接受了筛查,其中包括乳腺钼靶检查和体格检查。作者根据检出率以及所发现乳腺癌的大小、分期和组织学类型,研究了这两种检查的相对贡献。
共检测出135例癌症。乳腺钼靶检查发现了所有癌症中的131例(97.0%),而体格检查仅发现了66例(48.9%)。此外,乳腺钼靶检查发现的病变通常较小且处于早期阶段。
尽管大多数其他筛查项目仅涉及乳腺钼靶检查,但体格检查在作者所在机构的检出率方面确实做出了贡献。然而,在资源减少和成本控制的时代,有必要对体格检查所增加的价值进行批判性分析。