Harris N, Neufeld E J, Newburger J W, Ticho B, Baker A, Ginsburg G S, Rimm E, Rifai N
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Clin Chem. 1996 Aug;42(8 Pt 1):1182-8.
This study compares a new latex immunoseparation method for the direct determination of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with the reference procedure for LDL-C (beta-quantification) in a pediatric hyperlipidemic population. The direct LDL-C assay has a mean bias of -98 mg/L in a fasting group (n = 96) of patients (mean triglycerides 1057 +/- 720 mg/L) and a bias of +177 mg/L in a nonfasting group (n = 42, mean triglycerides 4854 +/- 5457 mg/L). The mean total analytical error calculated from our data is 13.8%. The direct LDL-C assay and the commonly used Friedewald calculation respectively classified 81% and 84% of fasting patients correctly, according to the cutoffs of 1100 and 1300 mg/L for LDL-C set by the National Cholesterol Education Program for pediatric patients. Of combined fasting and nonfasting patients, 80% were correctly classified by the direct LDL-C assay. Therefore, despite several analytical shortcomings, the direct LDL-C assay may be useful in managing hyperlipidemic children without the need for a fasting specimen.
本研究在儿科高脂血症患者群体中,将一种用于直接测定血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的新型乳胶免疫分离方法与LDL-C的参考方法(β定量法)进行了比较。在一组空腹患者(n = 96,平均甘油三酯1057 +/- 720 mg/L)中,直接LDL-C测定的平均偏差为-98 mg/L,在非空腹组(n = 42,平均甘油三酯4854 +/- 5457 mg/L)中偏差为+177 mg/L。根据我们的数据计算出的平均总分析误差为13.8%。按照美国国家胆固醇教育计划为儿科患者设定的LDL-C临界值1100和1300 mg/L,直接LDL-C测定和常用的Friedewald计算方法分别正确分类了81%和84%的空腹患者。在空腹和非空腹患者合并群体中,直接LDL-C测定正确分类了80%的患者。因此,尽管存在一些分析缺陷,但直接LDL-C测定对于管理高脂血症儿童可能有用,无需空腹样本。