Suppr超能文献

医疗护理的使用与后续死亡率:性别的重要性。

Use of care and subsequent mortality: the importance of gender.

作者信息

Franks P, Gold M R, Clancy C M

机构信息

Primary Care Institute, Highland Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):347-63.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In light of recent discussions on access that have emphasized the need to relate access measures to outcomes, we examined the relationship between three self-reported utilization and access to care measures and the risk of subsequent mortality. DATA SOURCES AND DESIGN: A nationally representative sample from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey that included adults 25-64 years of age without publicly funded health insurance was followed prospectively from initial interview in 1971 through 1975.

DATA COLLECTION

Complete baseline and follow-up information was obtained on 4,491 persons (90 percent). Baseline access and use was assessed with answers to three questions: having a usual source of care, obtaining a general checkup, and not obtaining needed care (or forgone care). The relationships between the access and use measures and mortality by 1987 in men and women were examined using survival analyses. The analyses adjusted for race, and for baseline age, education, income, residence, insurance status, employment status, the presence of morbidity on examination, self-rated health, smoking status, leisure exercise, alcohol consumption, and obesity.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After adjusting for all other baseline variables, not obtaining a general checkup was associated with higher mortality in women (hazard ratio = 1.64 [95% confidence interval = 1.16, 2.32]), but not in men (hazard ratio = 1.07 [95% confidence interval = 0.80, 1.42]). Reporting a usual source of care and forgone care were not related to subsequent mortality in either women or men.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting a general checkup is an outcome-related utilization measure in women only. Further development of access and use indicators should address gender differences in health care use.

摘要

目的

鉴于近期关于医疗服务可及性的讨论强调了将可及性措施与结果相关联的必要性,我们研究了三项自我报告的医疗服务利用和可及性措施与后续死亡风险之间的关系。

数据来源与设计

从第一次全国健康和营养检查调查中选取了一个具有全国代表性的样本,该样本包括25 - 64岁没有公共资助医疗保险的成年人,从1971年的首次访谈开始进行前瞻性跟踪,直至1975年。

数据收集

获得了4491人(90%)完整的基线和随访信息。通过回答三个问题来评估基线时的可及性和使用情况:是否有常规的医疗服务来源、是否进行过全面体检以及是否未获得所需的医疗服务(或放弃治疗)。使用生存分析研究了1987年时这些可及性和使用措施与男性和女性死亡率之间的关系。分析对种族以及基线年龄、教育程度、收入、居住地、保险状况、就业状况、检查时的发病情况、自我评估的健康状况、吸烟状况、休闲运动、饮酒情况和肥胖进行了调整。

主要发现

在对所有其他基线变量进行调整后,未进行全面体检与女性较高的死亡率相关(风险比 = 1.64 [95%置信区间 = 1.16, 2.32]),但与男性死亡率无关(风险比 = 1.07 [95%置信区间 = 0.80, 1.42])。报告有常规的医疗服务来源和放弃治疗与男性或女性的后续死亡率均无关。

结论

报告进行全面体检仅是与女性结果相关的医疗服务利用指标。可及性和使用指标的进一步发展应考虑医疗服务利用中的性别差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
The sex differential in morbidity, mortality, and lifestyle.发病率、死亡率和生活方式方面的性别差异。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1984;5:433-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.05.050184.002245.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验