Barber J P, Crits-Christoph P, Luborsky L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia 19104-2648, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):619-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.619.
The authors examined the relation between therapist process variables (adherence and competence) and subsequent symptomatic change in patients. Twenty-nine depressed patients were seen in 16 sessions of weekly supportive expressive (SE) dynamic psychotherapy. Change in depression from intake to Session 3 predicted higher ratings of adherence to expressive (interpretative) techniques during Session 3 but not their competent delivery. Partialling pretreatment psychiatric severity, therapists' adherence to use of expressive techniques, and previous symptomatic improvement, relatively competent delivery of SE-specific expressive techniques predicted subsequent improvement in depression. Secondary analyses addressing alternative explanations (such as the role of either therapeutic alliance or general therapeutic skills) did not change the results.
作者研究了治疗师过程变量(依从性和胜任力)与患者随后症状变化之间的关系。29名抑郁症患者接受了为期16节的每周一次支持性表达(SE)动力心理治疗。从初次就诊到第3节时抑郁症状的变化预示着在第3节时对表达性(解释性)技术有更高的依从性评分,但与这些技术的有效运用无关。在排除预处理时的精神疾病严重程度、治疗师对表达性技术的使用依从性以及先前的症状改善情况后,SE特定表达性技术的相对有效运用预示着随后抑郁症状的改善。针对其他解释(如治疗联盟或一般治疗技能的作用)的二次分析并未改变结果。