Sexton H C, Hembre K, Kvarme G
Psychiatric Research Center, Asgård Hospital, Tromsø Norway.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):471-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.471.
The interaction of the working alliance with the therapy microprocess was explored in a sequential analytic study of brief therapy (N = 32). The alliance was largely formed within the first session and was most associated with a mutual emotional engagement process. Thereafter, log-linear modeling revealed marked alliance-related and primarily phase-specific effects on the therapy microprocesses. The alliance was associated with differing patterns of therapy activities, topics, emotions, and verbal content. High-alliance midtherapy displayed more of an alternating pattern of therapist-patient emotional engagement, although therapists also appeared to take greater charge in midtherapy. High-alliance patients were generally more emotionally engaged and responded with less dejection to therapists. The alliance-dependent differences in verbal content appeared to be secondary, with the most obvious negative effects of low-alliance levels appearing in midtherapy. Apparently, the high- and low-alliance therapies developed somewhat differently, a factor that may need to be considered in constructing theories of therapeutic change.
在一项针对短期治疗(N = 32)的序贯分析研究中,探讨了工作联盟与治疗微观过程的相互作用。联盟主要在第一疗程内形成,且与相互情感投入过程最为相关。此后,对数线性模型显示,联盟对治疗微观过程有显著的、主要是特定阶段的影响。联盟与不同的治疗活动、话题、情感和言语内容模式相关。高联盟中期治疗表现出更多治疗师 - 患者情感投入的交替模式,尽管治疗师在中期治疗中似乎也承担了更大的主导作用。高联盟患者通常情感投入更多,对治疗师的反应中沮丧情绪较少。言语内容中依赖联盟的差异似乎是次要的,低联盟水平最明显的负面影响出现在中期治疗。显然,高联盟和低联盟治疗的发展方式有所不同,这一因素在构建治疗变化理论时可能需要考虑。