Steflik D E, Noel C, McBrayer C, Lake F T, Parr G R, Sisk A L, Hanes P J
Medical College of Georgia, School of Dentistry, Augusta, USA.
J Oral Implantol. 1995;21(2):96-106.
To examine bone morphology associated with endosteal dental implants at various time intervals, we inserted 20 one-stage and 20 two-stage titanium blade implants and 20 one-stage and 20 two-stage titanium root-form implants into 30 dog mandibles. Sixteen implants in 6 control (c) dogs (in situ five months) did not receive bridgework. Sixty-four implants in 24 dogs supported bridges for six, 12, 18, or 24 months. The entire area of the mandible containing the implants was examined by routine light and Nomarski differential interference microscopy (NM) for bone morphology (including osteon orientation) at the implant surface and at regions away from the implant. Control root-form implants were apposed by woven bone, with homogenous compact bone in the cortical plate distant to the implant. After 6 mo of load, immature bone was predominant apposing the implant, but initial osteonal maturation was apparent. NM clearly demonstrated the interstitial and concentric lamellae of the bone. Surprisingly, compact bone formed internal to the cortical plate, an area where trabecular bone is expected. At later periods of load, more mature osteons were seen apposing the implants; however remodeling events were still apparent. These remodeling events extend further away from the implant than was expected if the events resulted only from surgical repair. Also, when the implant inclined so that half was totally in the cortical plate and half in the marrow (in trabecular patterns), osteonal bone appeared to remodel in both areas. Control blade implants and blades loaded for six months were apposed by immature osteons when the implant was placed into the cortical plate. A trabecular meshwork was inferior to the osteonal bone. At 12 mo of load, the bone internal to the cortical plate appeared similar to the lamina dura supporting teeth; however, no PDL existed; the lamina-dura-like pattern directly apposed the implant. Even after 24 mo of load, extensive bone remodeling was apparent adjacent to the implant, markedly different from the bone making up the existing cortical plate. From these data, remodeling activities to blade implants may involve the development of a lamina-dura-like bone morphology after longer periods of load. Osteonal bone was apparent, but only at regions where the implant was inserted into the cortical plate. Further, bone remodeling was apparent even after long periods of load.
为了在不同时间间隔检查与骨内牙种植体相关的骨形态,我们将20颗一期和20颗二期钛刀片种植体以及20颗一期和20颗二期钛根形种植体植入30只狗的下颌骨。6只对照(c)狗(原位放置5个月)的16颗种植体未进行桥接修复。24只狗的64颗种植体支撑桥接修复6、12、18或24个月。对包含种植体的下颌骨整个区域进行常规光镜和诺马斯基微分干涉显微镜(NM)检查,以观察种植体表面及远离种植体区域的骨形态(包括骨单位方向)。对照根形种植体周围为编织骨,在远离种植体的皮质板中有均匀的致密骨。加载6个月后,种植体周围主要是未成熟骨,但可见初始骨单位成熟。NM清晰显示了骨的间隙和同心板层。令人惊讶的是,致密骨在皮质板内部形成,而该区域预期应为小梁骨。在加载后期,可见更多成熟骨单位与种植体相邻;然而,重塑事件仍很明显。这些重塑事件比仅由手术修复导致的事件更远离种植体。此外,当种植体倾斜,使得一半完全位于皮质板内,一半位于骨髓(呈小梁模式)时,骨单位骨似乎在两个区域都发生了重塑。当将对照刀片种植体和加载6个月的刀片种植体植入皮质板时,其周围为未成熟骨单位。小梁网络不如骨单位骨。加载12个月时,皮质板内部的骨看起来类似于支持牙齿的硬骨板;然而,不存在牙周膜;类似硬骨板的模式直接与种植体相邻。即使在加载24个月后,种植体相邻区域仍有明显的广泛骨重塑,与构成现有皮质板的骨明显不同。根据这些数据,刀片种植体的重塑活动可能在较长加载期后涉及类似硬骨板的骨形态发育。骨单位骨明显,但仅在种植体插入皮质板的区域。此外,即使在长时间加载后,骨重塑仍很明显。