Trojan A
Institut für Medizin-Soziologie, Hamburg.
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 May;58(5):257-65.
My contribution is a systematic account of strategies for cooperation and feedback between public health sciences and research. A feature both areas have in common is their commitment to empirically based knowledge. "Rational" models of cooperation (or rather, models based on belief in rationality) presume simple linear links between research and its application. Diffusion models, however, seem to be far more adequate for translating public health research into reality. The best model is the "Discourse Model" based on continuous communication and feedback between science and practice. It seems to promote the diffusion of public health innovations most effectively. In the second part I give examples of how to translate the Discourse Model into practical reality. Summing up, its strategic elements are: 1. responsive project shaping, 2. interactive running of projects, 3. shared processing of results, 4. active diffusion of results.
我的贡献是对公共卫生科学与研究之间的合作及反馈策略进行了系统阐述。这两个领域的一个共同特点是它们都致力于基于实证的知识。“理性”的合作模式(或者更确切地说,基于对理性的信仰的模式)假定研究与其应用之间存在简单的线性联系。然而,扩散模型似乎更适合将公共卫生研究转化为实际行动。最佳模式是基于科学与实践之间持续沟通和反馈的“话语模型”。它似乎能最有效地促进公共卫生创新的传播。在第二部分,我给出了将话语模型转化为实际行动的示例。总而言之,其战略要素包括:1. 响应式项目塑造;2. 项目的互动运行;3. 结果的共享处理;4. 结果的积极传播。