Infante-Rivard C, Lortie M
Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jul;53(7):488-94. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.7.488.
To determine which factors measured at baseline and during the course of treatment influence time to return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain.
The design is a treatment inception cohort including 305 compensated workers out of 402 eligible ones presenting at two rehabilitation centres for conventional treatment. Crude and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated with the Cox's proportional hazards regression.
50% of workers had not returned to work after 112 days of follow up, and 11.3% still had not after 270 days. At the end of the study period (maximum follow up time was 1228 days), 230 workers (75.4%) had returned to work, 6.5% had not, and a similar percentage had retired, gone into vocational training, or returned to school. In the final model stratified for radiating pain during treatment, which was an important prognostic variable, workers between 21 to 30 years of age had a greater chance of returning to work (RR (95% CI) 1.43 (1.04 to 1.98) than those > or = 30. The other factors associated with a greater chance of returning to work were: a diagnosis of sprain or pain upsilon a diagnosis of intervertebral disc disorder (2.20 (1.23-3.91)), < 30 days of waiting between the accident and the beginning of treatment (1.30 (0.96 to 1.77)), a good flexion at baseline (1.52 (1.04 to 2.23)), absence of neurological symptoms during treatment (1.40 (0.98-2.00)), > 24 months of employment in the industry (1.49 (1.10 to 2.03)), working for a public industry upsilon a private one (1.63 (1.21 to 2.19)), and the ability to take unscheduled breaks (1.45 (1.06 to 1.97)).
Even with a first episode of back pain, time to return to work is long and the proportion not returning is high. Return to work as expected is influenced by disease and host characteristics but also by social and work factors. Reinstatement programmes should account for all these factors.
确定在基线期和治疗过程中所测量的哪些因素会影响首次因背痛获得补偿性病假后的重返工作时间。
本研究设计为一个治疗起始队列,在两个康复中心接受常规治疗的402名符合条件的工人中有305名获得补偿性病假。采用Cox比例风险回归估计粗率比和调整率比(RRs)以及95%置信区间(95% CIs)。
随访112天后,50%的工人未重返工作岗位,随访270天后仍有11.3%未重返。在研究期末(最长随访时间为1228天),230名工人(75.4%)已重返工作岗位,6.5%未重返,另有相似比例的工人已退休、参加职业培训或返校学习。在最终模型中,按治疗期间的放射性疼痛分层(这是一个重要的预后变量),21至30岁的工人比30岁及以上的工人有更大的重返工作机会(RR(95% CI)1.43(1.04至1.98))。与更大的重返工作机会相关的其他因素包括:诊断为扭伤或疼痛而非椎间盘疾病(2.20(1.23 - 3.91))、事故与治疗开始之间的等待时间<30天(1.30(0.96至1.77))、基线时良好的屈曲度(1.52(1.04至2.23))、治疗期间无神经症状(1.40(0.98 - 2.00))、在该行业工作>24个月(1.49(1.10至2.03))、为公共行业而非私营行业工作(1.63(1.21至2.19))以及能够安排不定期休息(1.45(1.06至1.97))。
即使是首次背痛发作,重返工作的时间也很长,未重返的比例很高。如期重返工作受疾病和宿主特征影响,但也受社会和工作因素影响。恢复工作方案应考虑所有这些因素。