Peralta-Carcelen M, Fargason C A, Cliver S P, Cutter G R, Gigante J, Goldenberg R L
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Aug;150(8):802-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170330028005.
The American Academy of Pediatrics strategy to prevent early-onset neonatal sepsis with group B streptococcus (GBS) relies on maternal antepartum GBS cultures, while the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology strategy does not.
To evaluate the impact of the 2 strategies on the care of asymptomatic full-term newborns.
DESIGN/SETTING: Self-administered survey mailed to a national random sample of US pediatricians who were members of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
A total of 461 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics who routinely care for newborns.
Self-report of diagnostic and treatment strategies for asymptomatic full-term newborns who were born under different clinical scenarios. Maternal risk factors, antepartum maternal GBS screening status, and maternal treatment with intrapartum antibiotics were varied across the scenarios.
Pediatricians treating asymptomatic full-term newborns born to risk factor-negative mothers reported ordering tests (63.3% in GBS-positive cases vs 6.7% with GBS unknown; P = .001) and antibiotics (21.5% in GBS-positive cases vs 0.9% with GBS unknown; P = .001) more frequently when presented with a positive maternal GBS screening result. Maternal intrapartum treatment had little impact on pediatric practice when risk factors were absent. In risk factor-positive mothers, pediatricians reported an increase in their antibiotic usage in response to a positive maternal GBS screen (61.8% in GBS-positive cases vs 36.9% with GBS unknown; P = .001). In risk factor-positive mothers with unknown results of GBS screening, use of intrapartum antibiotics increased the number of pediatricians who reported that they would prescribe antibiotic therapy.
Obstetrical strategies to decrease the risk of neonatal GBS sepsis increase pediatric services provided to full-term healthy newborns. This increase in services by pediatric practices is likely to be greater with the screening-based strategy recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
美国儿科学会预防早发型新生儿B族链球菌(GBS)败血症的策略依赖于产妇产前GBS培养,而美国妇产科医师学会的策略则不然。
评估这两种策略对无症状足月儿护理的影响。
设计/地点:向美国儿科学会会员中的全国随机抽样儿科医生邮寄自行填写的调查问卷。
总共461名美国儿科学会会员,他们日常负责照顾新生儿。
对在不同临床情况下出生的无症状足月儿的诊断和治疗策略的自我报告。产妇风险因素、产前产妇GBS筛查状况以及产时抗生素治疗在不同情况下有所不同。
治疗风险因素阴性母亲所生无症状足月儿的儿科医生报告称,当产妇GBS筛查结果为阳性时,更频繁地进行检测(GBS阳性病例中为63.3%,GBS情况未知时为6.7%;P = 0.00)和使用抗生素(GBS阳性病例中为21.5%,GBS情况未知时为0.9%;P = 0.001)。当不存在风险因素时,产妇产时治疗对儿科实践影响不大。对于风险因素阳性的母亲,儿科医生报告称,产妇GBS筛查阳性时其抗生素使用增加(GBS阳性病例中为61.8%,GBS情况未知时为36.9%;P = 0.001)。在GBS筛查结果未知的风险因素阳性母亲中,产时使用抗生素增加了报告称会开具抗生素治疗的儿科医生数量。
降低新生儿GBS败血症风险的产科策略增加了为足月健康新生儿提供的儿科服务。采用美国儿科学会推荐的基于筛查的策略,儿科实践中服务的增加可能会更大。