Williams R C, Beck J D, Offenbacher S N
School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Mar;23(3 Pt 2):299-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb02093.x.
The last 25 years have brought unprecedented advances to our understanding of periodontal disease. Consider that in 1970 periodontitis was believed to effect most individuals over the age of 35 years, to progress steadily in an individual once initiated until teeth were lost, to be the primary cause of tooth loss in adults, to be caused by the bacterial mass accumulating on the tooth surface and subgingivally, and to involve the host in some fashion or another. In the 25 years since then, impressive research advances in the epidemiology of periodontal disease, the specific bacterial etiology of periodontal disease and the immunoinflammatory mediators of periodontal tissue destruction have greatly altered our view of periodontal disease. Thus, given these research advances in the understanding of periodontitis, what may the future hold for improved diagnosis and treatment of periodontal disease? Impressive research into new ways to diagnose the periodontal diseases is well underway. Investigators are seeking new ways to diagnose an individual's degree of risk for periodontal disease initiation, susceptibility to disease progression, level of disease "activity" and the likely response to treatment and recurrence of active disease. New diagnostic tests should greatly advance our ability to more accurately and specifically diagnose periodontal disease. The future also looks promising for new treatment strategies to slow or arrest periodontal disease progression. The bacterial specificity of periodontal disease etiology revealed since 1970 has logically led to the use of antibiotics in periodontitis treatment. In the late 1980s the concept of locally delivering antibiotics to the periodontal pocket was introduced, and subsequent clinical trials have indicated that it is possible to reduce pocket depth and inflammation with tetracycline locally delivered to the periodontal pocket. Likely, we have barely scratched the surface in studying the efficacy of locally delivery antimicrobial agents to alter the progression of periodontal disease. As new agents are developed and better delivery systems to the periodontal pocket are developed, the future should see a variety of antimicrobial agents available which can slow periodontal disease progression. The future also holds promise for slowing periodontal disease progression by blocking inflammatory pathways important in periodontal tissue destruction. Clinical trials of flubiprofen, naproxen and ketoprofen indicate that it is possible to slow periodontal disease progression with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs which inhibit one destructive pathway. In addition, data from animal models indicate that chemically modified tetracycline as an inhibitor of collagenase can slow disease progression in animals. Again, we have likely only just begun to explore the wide range of molecular mediators of tissue destruction which may be targeted for blocking and thereby slow or arrest periodontal disease progression. Last, research into regenerating periodontal structures lost as a result of disease has had a noteworthy record of progress in the past 25 years. Techniques that utilize bone grafts, root treatments, tissue guiding membranes or polypeptide growth factors have ably indicated that it is possible to regenerate new attachment structures in humans. As investigators continue to unravel the mysteries of the embryonic development of the periodontium, the ability to predictably regenerate lost periodontal attachment structures holds great promise for the future.
在过去的25年里,我们对牙周病的认识取得了前所未有的进展。回想一下,在1970年,人们认为牙周炎会影响大多数35岁以上的人,一旦发病,在个体中会持续稳步发展,直至牙齿脱落,它是成年人牙齿脱落的主要原因,是由牙齿表面和龈下积累的细菌团引起的,并且在某种程度上涉及宿主。从那时起的25年里,牙周病流行病学、牙周病的特定细菌病因以及牙周组织破坏的免疫炎症介质方面令人瞩目的研究进展极大地改变了我们对牙周病的看法。那么,鉴于在牙周炎认识方面的这些研究进展,牙周病诊断和治疗的未来会怎样呢?针对牙周病新诊断方法的出色研究正在顺利进行。研究人员正在寻找新的方法来诊断个体患牙周病的起始风险程度、疾病进展的易感性、疾病“活动”水平以及对治疗的可能反应和活动性疾病的复发情况。新的诊断测试将极大地提高我们更准确、更具体地诊断牙周病的能力。牙周病治疗的新策略在减缓或阻止疾病进展方面,未来看起来也很有希望。自1970年以来揭示的牙周病病因的细菌特异性合理地导致了抗生素在牙周炎治疗中的应用。在20世纪80年代后期,将抗生素局部输送到牙周袋的概念被引入,随后的临床试验表明,将四环素局部输送到牙周袋可以减少牙周袋深度和炎症。很可能,我们在研究局部输送抗菌剂改变牙周病进展的功效方面才刚刚触及皮毛。随着新药物的开发以及更好的牙周袋输送系统的开发,未来将会有多种能够减缓牙周病进展的抗菌剂。通过阻断在牙周组织破坏中起重要作用的炎症途径来减缓牙周病进展,未来也很有希望。氟比洛芬、萘普生和酮洛芬的临床试验表明,使用抑制一种破坏途径的非甾体抗炎药有可能减缓牙周病进展。此外,动物模型的数据表明,作为胶原酶抑制剂的化学修饰四环素可以减缓动物疾病的进展。同样,我们可能才刚刚开始探索广泛的组织破坏分子介质,这些介质可能成为被阻断的靶点,从而减缓或阻止牙周病进展。最后,在过去25年里,针对因疾病而丧失的牙周结构再生的研究取得了显著进展。利用骨移植、牙根治疗、组织引导膜或多肽生长因子的技术有力地表明,在人类中再生新的附着结构是可能的。随着研究人员继续解开牙周膜胚胎发育的奥秘,可预测地再生丧失的牙周附着结构的能力在未来大有希望。