统计失当行为
Statistical malpractice.
作者信息
Charlton B G
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
出版信息
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 Mar-Apr;30(2):112-4.
Abstract
Statistical malpractice is an insidious, and indeed prestige-laden and grant-rewarded, activity. Brilliantly clever, but fundamentally wrong-headed, number-crunchers are encouraged to devise inappropriate applications of mathematical methods to health problems. This species of misdirected zealot has so far been immune from criticism.
摘要
统计失当行为是一种阴险的行为，实际上它还承载着声望并能获得研究经费奖励。那些极其聪明但根本思路错误的数字运算者，被鼓励将数学方法不适当地应用于健康问题。到目前为止，这种误入歧途的狂热分子一直免受批评。
相似文献
1
Statistical malpractice.统计失当行为
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1996 Mar-Apr;30(2):112-4.
2
A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice.对初始数据分析采用系统的方法是良好的研究实践。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Handling the fragile vase of scientific practices.处理科学实践的易碎花瓶。 （此译文可能不太符合准确语境意义，原文表述稍显奇特，或许有更合适的翻译方式，比如“对待科学实践中脆弱的环节”等，但按要求严格翻译就是这样。）
Addiction. 2015 Jan;110(1):9-10. doi: 10.1111/add.12720.
4
How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.我们应该期望出错的频率有多高？统计功效、P 值以及错误发现的预期发生率。
Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 May;151:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.高影响力心理学期刊编辑和审稿人的调查：投稿中存在的统计学和研究设计问题。
J Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;145(3):195-209. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.555431.
6
Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions.数据和分析问题：错误、潜在主题和潜在解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2563-2570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708279115.
7
Comparison is key.比较是关键。
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(1):26-39.
8
[Hinge points of scientific research].[科学研究的关键点]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2001 Jun(65):29-52.
9
Statistical approaches to the design of toxicology studies.毒理学研究设计的统计学方法。
Curr Protoc Toxicol. 2001;Chapter 1:Unit1.2. doi: 10.1002/0471140856.tx0102s00.
10
Documenting research in scientific articles: guidelines for authors: reporting research designs and activities.科学文章中的研究记录：作者指南：报告研究设计与活动
Chest. 2006 Oct;130(4):1263-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.4.1263.
引用本文的文献
1
Fundamental deficiencies in the megatrial methodology.大规模试验方法的根本缺陷。
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2(1):2-7. doi: 10.1186/cvm-2-1-002.
2
Megatrials are based on a methodological mistake.大型试验基于一个方法学上的错误。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jul;46(408):429-31.
本文引用的文献
1
A critique of Geoffrey Rose's 'population strategy' for preventive medicine.对杰弗里·罗斯预防医学“人群策略”的批判。
J R Soc Med. 1995 Nov;88(11):607-10. doi: 10.1177/014107689508801102.
2
The scandal of poor medical research.糟糕的医学研究丑闻。
BMJ. 1994 Jan 29;308(6924):283-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283.
3
Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications.大型试验：方法学问题及临床意义
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Mar-Apr;29(2):96-100.
Zotero 插件