Suppr超能文献

使用Medstone碎石机进行非门控操作。

The use of ungating with the Medstone lithotriptor.

作者信息

Cass A S

机构信息

Midwest Stone Unit, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1996 Sep;156(3):896-8.

PMID:8709357
Abstract

PURPOSE

Ungating using the Medstone* lithotriptor by 200 urologists was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 1994, 3,288 patients were treated by 200 urologists at 46 sites in 6 upper midwest states using 5 fixed and 3 mobile Medstone lithotriptors. Ungating was used with 58 treatments in 57 asymptomatic patients (1.8%) due to irregular cardiac rhythm in 48 caused by a bundle branch block (11), atrial fibrillation (10), slow heart rate (6) and irregular cardiac complex (21); all 48 cases were clinically insignificant, and because of urologist choice in 9 with normal cardiac rhythm (10 treatments). The cardiac simulator used for ungated lithotripsy was set at 85 shocks per minute for irregular cardiac rhythm and at 120 shocks per minute for elective use.

RESULTS

The 48 treatments in patients with clinically insignificant irregular cardiac rhythm (average age 66.4 years) were performed during an average of 41 minutes of shock time. One patient had clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia that resolved with gating. The 10 elective treatments were performed during an average of 34 minutes of shock time in patients an average of 60.4 years old. The 3,231 gated treatments were performed during an average of 40 minutes of shock time in patients an average of 51 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Ungating was safe and effective in allowing patients with an irregular cardiac rhythm to be treated with the same shock time as gated cases (normal cardiac rhythm).

摘要

目的

评估200名泌尿科医生使用Medstone*碎石机进行非门控操作的情况。

材料与方法

1994年期间,美国中西部6个州46个地点的200名泌尿科医生使用5台固定式和3台移动式Medstone碎石机治疗了3288例患者。57例无症状患者(1.8%)的58次治疗采用了非门控操作,其中48例因束支传导阻滞(11例)、心房颤动(10例)、心率过缓(6例)和心脏复合波异常(21例)导致心律不齐;所有48例在临床上均无显著意义,另外9例心律正常的患者(10次治疗)是由于泌尿科医生的选择。用于非门控碎石术的心脏模拟器在心律不齐时设置为每分钟85次冲击,选择性使用时设置为每分钟120次冲击。

结果

48例临床上无显著意义的心律不齐患者(平均年龄66.4岁)的治疗平均冲击时间为41分钟。1例患者出现临床上显著的心律失常,通过门控操作得到解决。10例选择性治疗的平均冲击时间为34分钟,患者平均年龄60.4岁。3231例门控治疗的平均冲击时间为40分钟,患者平均年龄51岁。

结论

非门控操作安全有效,可使心律不齐的患者与门控病例(心律正常)在相同的冲击时间内接受治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验