Potgieter F J, Wilke P I
Animal Unit G 20, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa.
Lab Anim. 1996 Jan;30(1):79-87. doi: 10.1258/002367796780744893.
Vermiculite, pine shavings and unbleached eucalyptus pulp contact bedding were compared for dust content, dust production (as a result of animal activity), moisture absorption properties and ammonia production. The percentage of dust particles <300 microm found in pine shavings and vermiculite was 18 and 8 times greater respectively than was found in eucalyptus pulp. The lowest ammonia levels (<1-1 ppm), measured on day 7, were obtained using eucalyptus pulp. Although the ammonia levels obtained for vermiculite compared very well with those of pulp, high levels of dust, up to 5 times more than pulp, were experienced with vermiculite. Pine shavings were associated with the highest ammonia concentration (1-3 ppm), but produced approximately 50% less dust than vermiculite. The water absorption properties obtained for pulp were between 35% and 76% higher than those obtained for vermiculite and pine shavings respectively.
对蛭石、松木刨花和未漂白桉木浆接触垫料的灰尘含量、灰尘产生量(由于动物活动)、吸湿性能和氨气产生量进行了比较。在松木刨花和蛭石中发现的<300微米灰尘颗粒的百分比分别比桉木浆中发现的高18倍和8倍。在第7天测量时,使用桉木浆获得的氨气水平最低(<1 - 1 ppm)。虽然蛭石获得的氨气水平与浆的水平相比非常好,但蛭石产生的灰尘量很高,比浆多5倍。松木刨花的氨气浓度最高(1 - 3 ppm),但产生的灰尘比蛭石少约50%。浆的吸水性能分别比蛭石和松木刨花的吸水性能高35%至76%。