Suppr超能文献

保留大隐静脉以备将来用于移植的替代手术。

Alternative saphenous vein sparing surgery for future grafting.

作者信息

Zamboni P, Marcellino M G, Feo C V, Pisano L, Vasquez G, Bertasi M, Liboni A

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Panminerva Med. 1995 Dec;37(4):190-7.

PMID:8710399
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of long saphenous vein sparing surgical procedures alternative to high ligation and distal stab avulsion, in terms of effectiveness and suitability for eventual by-pass surgery.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Prospective evaluation of 125 operations for primary varicose veins, 52 external valve-plasties of the sapheno-femoral junction (EV-SFJ) (42 performed using the hand sewing technique and 10 using the Veno-cuff device), mean follow-up 45 months, and 73 hemodynamic correction of varicose veins (French acronyms: CHIVA), mean follow-up 30 months.

SETTING

Department of General Surgery, University of Ferrara. Institutional practice, one-day surgery.

PATIENTS

Patients were selected using clinical, Doppler cw, and duplex scanning evaluations. Patients with early varices due to sapheno-femoral reflux with duplex scanning evidence of mobile valve leaflets underwent EV-SFJ. The other patients were operated on using the hemodynamic correction technique. Both groups underwent preoperative ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) and light reflection rheography-refilling time (LRR-RT) measurements.

INTERVENTIONS

EV-SFJ restores valve function correcting vein wall dilitation by applying an external prosthesis. CHIVA consists of selected ligatures of the superficial veins that allow superficial blood aspiration in the deep veins through the perforators.

MEASURES

The outcome was evaluated with clinical and ultrasonographic examinations, AVP and LRR-RT measurements.

RESULTS

Long saphenous vein patency registered after EV-SFJ and CHIVA was 94.2% and 90.4%, respectively. Both treatments preserve the drainage function in the saphenous system. Varicose veins recurrence percentage rate was 9.6% and 10.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the proposed selection criteria, these two alternative procedures seem to be more effective in varices treatment than high ligation and have the advantage of preserving saphenous veins suitable for eventual by-pass surgery.

摘要

目的

评估保留大隐静脉的手术方法替代高位结扎和远端穿刺剥脱术的效果,以及其对最终旁路手术的有效性和适用性。

实验设计

对125例原发性静脉曲张手术、52例大隐静脉-股静脉交界处的外部瓣膜修复术(EV-SFJ)(42例采用手工缝合技术,10例采用静脉袖带装置)进行前瞻性评估,平均随访45个月;对73例静脉曲张的血流动力学矫正术(法语缩写:CHIVA)进行前瞻性评估,平均随访30个月。

地点

费拉拉大学普通外科。机构实践,日间手术。

患者

通过临床、多普勒连续波和双功扫描评估选择患者。因大隐静脉-股静脉反流导致早期静脉曲张且双功扫描显示瓣膜小叶可活动的患者接受EV-SFJ。其他患者采用血流动力学矫正技术进行手术。两组患者均进行术前动态静脉压(AVP)和光反射血流描记术-再充盈时间(LRR-RT)测量。

干预措施

EV-SFJ通过应用外部假体恢复瓣膜功能,纠正静脉壁扩张。CHIVA包括对浅静脉进行选择性结扎,使浅静脉血液通过穿通支进入深静脉。

测量指标

通过临床和超声检查、AVP和LRR-RT测量评估结果。

结果

EV-SFJ和CHIVA术后大隐静脉通畅率分别为94.2%和90.4%。两种治疗方法均保留了大隐静脉系统的引流功能。静脉曲张复发率分别为9.6%和10.9%。

结论

按照所提出的选择标准,这两种替代手术方法在治疗静脉曲张方面似乎比高位结扎更有效,并且具有保留适合最终旁路手术的大隐静脉的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验