• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理物理学标度中的强度分辨率与主观量值

Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling.

作者信息

Ward L M, Armstrong J, Golestani N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jul;58(5):793-801. doi: 10.3758/bf03213110.

DOI:10.3758/bf03213110
PMID:8710456
Abstract

Several successful theories of psychophysical judgment imply that exponents of power functions in scaling tasks should covary with measures of intensity resolution such as d' in the same tasks, whereas the prevailing metatheory of ideal psychophysical scaling asserts the independence of the two. In a direct test of this relationship, three prominent psychophysical scaling paradigms were studied: category judgment without an identification function, absolute magnitude estimation, and cross-modality matching with light intensity as the response continuum. Separate groups of subjects for each scaling paradigm made repeated judgments of the loudnesses of the pure tones that constituted each of two stimulus ensembles. The narrow- and wide-range ensembles shared six identical stimulus intensities in the middle of each set. Intensity resolution, as measured by d'-like distances, of these physically identical stimuli was significantly worse for the wide-range set for all three methods. Exponents of power functions fitted to geometric mean responses, and in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching the geometric mean responses themselves, were also significantly smaller in the wide-range condition. The variation of power function exponents, and of psychophysical scale values, for stimulus intensities that were identical in the two stimulus sets with the intensities of other members of the ensembles is inconsistent with the metatheory on which modern psychophysical scaling practice is based, although it is consistent with other useful approaches to measurement of psychological magnitudes.

摘要

几种成功的心理物理学判断理论表明,在标度任务中幂函数的指数应该与同一任务中的强度分辨率测量值(如d')共同变化,而理想心理物理学标度的主流元理论则主张两者相互独立。在对这种关系的直接测试中,研究了三种著名的心理物理学标度范式:没有识别功能的类别判断、绝对大小估计以及以光强度作为响应连续体的跨通道匹配。针对每种标度范式,不同组的受试者对构成两个刺激集的纯音的响度进行了重复判断。窄范围和宽范围的刺激集在每组中间共享六个相同的刺激强度。对于这三种方法,通过类似d'的距离测量的这些物理上相同的刺激在宽范围刺激集中的强度分辨率明显更差。在宽范围条件下,拟合几何平均反应的幂函数的指数,以及在大小估计和跨通道匹配中几何平均反应本身,也明显更小。对于两个刺激集中相同的刺激强度以及与刺激集其他成员强度的幂函数指数和心理物理学标度值的变化,与现代心理物理学标度实践所基于的元理论不一致,尽管它与其他测量心理量值的有用方法一致。

相似文献

1
Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling.心理物理学标度中的强度分辨率与主观量值
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jul;58(5):793-801. doi: 10.3758/bf03213110.
2
Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents.
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jun;47(6):551-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03203107.
3
Memory for psychophysical scaling judgments.心理物理学标度判断的记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Sep;6(3):472-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03210837.
4
Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics.范围与回归、响度标度以及响度处理:迈向情境相关的心理物理学
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Nov;16(4):706-27. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.4.706.
5
Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling.对过去声音的回忆:记忆与心理物理学标度
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 May;13(2):216-27. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.216.
6
Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: a study of individual differences.刺激情境与绝对大小估计:个体差异研究
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jul;50(1):45-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03212204.
7
Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?刺激情境会影响响度,还是仅影响响度判断?
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Nov;48(5):409-18. doi: 10.3758/bf03211584.
8
Auditory psychophysical scaling exposure effects: magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching.
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Apr;66(2):643-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.66.2.643.
9
Mixed-method mixed-modality psychophysical scaling.混合方法混合模态心理物理学标度法
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Dec;48(6):571-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03211603.
10
Magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching of lingual vibrotactile and auditory sensation.舌部振动触觉与听觉感受的量级估计及跨模态匹配
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Sep;32(3):698-702. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3203.698.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving across-laboratory replicability in psychophysical scaling.在心理物理学标度中实现跨实验室的可重复性。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 2;6:903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00903. eCollection 2015.
2
Certainty in categorical judgment of size.大小分类判断中的确定性。
PLoS One. 2009 Jul 10;4(7):e6198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006198.
3
Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):235-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193836.

本文引用的文献

1
An equal discriminability scale for loudness judgments.
J Exp Psychol. 1952 Mar;43(3):232-8. doi: 10.1037/h0056953.
2
The influence of practice and pitch-distance between tones on the absolute identification of pitch.练习以及音调之间的音高距离对音高绝对识别的影响。
Am J Psychol. 1954 Mar;67(1):1-14.
3
The stimulus range effect: evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition.
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jul;56(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03211685.
4
Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: a validation.
感觉量值的绝对标度:一项验证
Percept Psychophys. 1980 Jul;28(1):28-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03204312.
5
Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity.
Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):103-12. doi: 10.3758/bf03202827.
6
Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1969 Aug;46(2):372-83. doi: 10.1121/1.1911699.
7
On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law.关于史蒂文斯定律中的指数和埃克曼定律中的常数。
Psychol Rev. 1971 Jan;78(1):71-80. doi: 10.1037/h0030300.
8
Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law.心理物理学标度中的范围效应与史蒂文斯定律的修正
Am J Psychol. 1973 Mar;86(1):3-27.
9
Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment.
Psychol Rev. 1973 May;80(3):203-16. doi: 10.1037/h0034281.
10
Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.量级估计与感觉匹配。
Percept Psychophys. 1988 Jun;43(6):511-25. doi: 10.3758/bf03207739.