Benner S A, Gerloff D, Chelvanayagam G
Department of Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Proteins. 1995 Nov;23(3):446-53. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230318.
Two bona fide consensus predictions of secondary and tertiary structure in a protein family, made and announced before experimental structures were known, are evaluated in light of the subsequently determined experimental structures. The first, for phospho-beta-galactosidase, identified the core strands of an 8-fold alpha-beta barrel, and identified the 8-fold alpha-beta barrel itself, which was found in the subsequently determined experimental structure to be the core folding domain. The second, for synaptotagmin, identified seven out of eight beta-strands in the structure correctly, missing only a noncore strand. Three preferred "topologies" were selected from several hundred thousand possible topologies of these seven predicted strands using a rule-based analysis. The subsequently determined experimental structure showed that these seven strands in synaptotagmin adopt one of the three preferred topologies. We were unable, however, to identify the correct topology from among these three topologies.
在实验结构确定之前做出并公布的蛋白质家族二级和三级结构的两个真实的一致性预测,根据随后确定的实验结构进行了评估。第一个是关于磷酸β-半乳糖苷酶的预测,它确定了一个8重α-β桶状结构的核心链,并识别出了8重α-β桶状结构本身,在随后确定的实验结构中发现它是核心折叠结构域。第二个是关于突触结合蛋白的预测,正确识别出了结构中八条β链中的七条,只遗漏了一条非核心链。使用基于规则的分析从这七条预测链的几十万种可能拓扑结构中选择了三种优选的“拓扑结构”。随后确定的实验结构表明,突触结合蛋白中的这七条链采用了三种优选拓扑结构中的一种。然而,我们无法从这三种拓扑结构中识别出正确的拓扑结构。