Garb H N, Schramke C J
Psychology Service, Highland Drive Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, USA.
Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):140-53. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.140.
The authors review judgment research in the area of neuropsychological assessment. Topics include the reliability and validity of judgments, the appropriateness of confidence ratings, the value of training and experience, the cognitive processes of neuropsychologists, and the use of decision aids, including automated assessment programs and statistical prediction rules. Most of the research is on reliability and validity. The results indicate that neuropsychologists frequently make reliable and moderately valid judgments. However, for several tasks, experimenters have not studied the reliability and validity of judgments.
作者们回顾了神经心理学评估领域的判断研究。主题包括判断的信度和效度、信心评级的适当性、培训和经验的价值、神经心理学家的认知过程以及决策辅助工具的使用，包括自动评估程序和统计预测规则。大部分研究集中在信度和效度方面。结果表明，神经心理学家经常做出可靠且具有一定效度的判断。然而，对于一些任务，实验者尚未研究判断的信度和效度。
