Suppr超能文献

分离性身份障碍的社会认知模型:证据的重新审视

The sociocognitive model of dissociative identity disorder: a reexamination of the evidence.

作者信息

Gleaves D H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):42-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.42.

Abstract

According to the sociocognitive model of dissociative identity disorder (DID; formerly, multiple personality disorder), DID is not a valid psychiatric disorder of posttraumatic origin; rather, it is a creation of psychotherapy and the media. Support for the model was recently presented by N.P. Spanos (1994). In this article, the author reexamines the evidence for the model and concludes that it is based on numerous false assumptions about the psychopathology, assessment, and treatment of DID. Most recent research on the dissociative disorders does not support (and in fact disconfirms) the sociocognitive model, and many inferences drawn from previous research appear unwarranted. No reason exists to doubt the connection between DID and childhood trauma. Treatment recommendations that follow from the sociocognitive model may be harmful because they involve ignoring the posttraumatic symptomatology of persons with DID.

摘要

根据分离性身份障碍(DID;以前称为多重人格障碍)的社会认知模型,DID并非源于创伤的有效精神疾病;相反,它是心理治疗和媒体的产物。N.P. 斯帕诺斯(1994年)最近提出了对该模型的支持。在本文中,作者重新审视了该模型的证据,并得出结论,它基于许多关于DID的精神病理学、评估和治疗的错误假设。关于分离性障碍的最新研究并不支持(实际上是反驳)社会认知模型,并且从先前研究中得出的许多推论似乎毫无根据。没有理由怀疑DID与童年创伤之间的联系。源于社会认知模型的治疗建议可能有害,因为它们涉及忽视DID患者的创伤后症状。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验