Rossi J
Naval Medical Research Institute Detachment, Tri-Service Toxicology Consortium, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7903, USA.
Toxicology. 1996 Jul 17;111(1-3):87-100. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03394-x.
It has been suggested that the neurobehavioral dysfunction observed in persons presenting with symptoms of Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) syndrome involves sensitization of neural circuits. Two hypotheses for the route of exposure in induction of neural sensitization in MCS are: (a) direct chemical stimulation of olfactory processes, or (b) general systemic response to inhaled chemicals. In either case, the mechanism of action may involve chemical kindling or kindling-related phenomena. A neural sensitization mechanism based on kindling or kindling-related phenomena is attractive and has been previously demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo animal models. Without a testable animal model for chemically mediated induction of MCS, however, any argument that MCS is mediated by kindling or kindling-related phenomena is reduced to the circular argument "the mechanism of sensitization is sensitization." The present survey provides an overview of the experimental paradigms that result in sensitization, differentiated on the basis of probable neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms. Neurophysiological potentiation, electrical kindling, chemical kindling and behavioral sensitization are evaluated and discussed in relationship to MCS.
有人提出,患有多重化学敏感性(MCS)综合征症状的人所观察到的神经行为功能障碍涉及神经回路的致敏作用。关于MCS中神经致敏诱导的暴露途径有两种假说:(a)对嗅觉过程的直接化学刺激,或(b)对吸入化学物质的一般全身反应。在任何一种情况下,作用机制可能涉及化学点燃或与点燃相关的现象。基于点燃或与点燃相关现象的神经致敏机制很有吸引力,并且先前已在体外和体内动物模型中得到证实。然而,由于没有用于化学介导的MCS诱导的可测试动物模型,任何关于MCS由点燃或与点燃相关现象介导的论点都沦为循环论证“致敏机制就是致敏作用”。本综述概述了导致致敏的实验范式,并根据可能的神经生理和神经化学机制进行了区分。对神经生理增强、电点燃、化学点燃和行为致敏与MCS的关系进行了评估和讨论。