Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions?
作者信息
Fishbein M
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1996 Aug;86(8):1075-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1075.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions?过高的期望，还是我们对社区层面的干预措施要求过多？
Am J Public Health. 1996 Aug;86(8):1075-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1075.
2
Assessing and developing the evidence base of macro practice interventions with a community and neighborhood focus.评估并发展以社区和邻里为重点的宏观实践干预措施的证据基础。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(3-4):519-47. doi: 10.1080/15433710802084284.
3
Do we ask too much from community-level interventions or from intervention researchers?
Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1727. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1727.
4
Integrating qualitative and quantitative components in evaluation of case management.在病例管理评估中整合定性和定量要素。
NIDA Res Monogr. 1992;127:223-50.
5
CDC prevention project one of few for young MSM.疾病控制与预防中心的预防项目是针对年轻男男性行为者的少数项目之一。
AIDS Alert. 2002 Aug;17(8):97-8.
6
An operational evaluation of the Community Oral Rehydration Units in Peru.秘鲁社区口服补液单位的运营评估。
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):438-43. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.4.438.
7
Short- and long-term outcomes of a health promotion program in a small rural community.
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(6):411-4. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.6.411.
8
Testing evaluation to the limits: the case of English Health Action Zones.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500102.
9
What can epidemiology contribute to comparative effectiveness research?流行病学能对比较效果研究做出什么贡献？
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Mar;67(3):206-7. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201682. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
10
More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions. Introduction to the special issue.针对社区层面健康干预措施的更合适评估方法。特刊引言。
Eval Rev. 1996 Jun;20(3):237-43. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9602000301.
引用本文的文献
1
Impact of a Community-level Intervention on HIV Stigma, Homophobia and HIV Testing in New York City: Results from Project CHHANGE.社区层面干预措施对纽约市艾滋病污名、恐同症及艾滋病检测的影响：“改变”项目的结果
Stigma Health. 2019 Feb;4(1):72-81. doi: 10.1037/sah0000109. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Church-based interventions to address obesity among African Americans and Latinos in the United States: a systematic review.基于教会的干预措施在美国解决非裔美国人和拉丁裔肥胖问题：系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Apr 1;78(4):304-322. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz046.
3
Eat, Pray, Move: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multilevel Church-Based Intervention to Address Obesity Among African Americans and Latinos.饮食、祈祷、运动：一项针对非裔美国人和拉丁裔人群肥胖问题的多层次教会为基础的干预措施的试点群组随机对照试验。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 May;33(4):586-596. doi: 10.1177/0890117118813333. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
4
Effects of advertisements on smokers' interest in trying e-cigarettes: the roles of product comparison and visual cues.广告对吸烟者尝试电子烟兴趣的影响：产品比较和视觉线索的作用。
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii31-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051718.
5
Linearity and nonlinearity in HIV/STI transmission: implications for the evaluation of sexual risk reduction interventions.HIV/性传播感染传播的线性和非线性：对性传播风险降低干预措施评估的影响。
Eval Rev. 2011 Oct;35(5):550-65. doi: 10.1177/0193841X11432196. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
6
Studies with staggered starts: multiple baseline designs and group-randomized trials.交错启动研究：多个基线设计和群组随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2164-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300264. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
7
Evaluation of stepping stones as a tool for changing knowledge, attitudes and behaviours associated with gender, relationships and HIV risk in Karnataka, India.评价踏脚石项目在改变印度卡纳塔克邦与性别、人际关系和艾滋病毒风险相关的知识、态度和行为方面的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 24;11:496. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-496.
8
The theory of community based health and safety programs: a critical examination.基于社区的健康与安全计划理论：批判性审视
Inj Prev. 2006 Jun;12(3):140-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011239.
9
Economic analysis of promotion of hepatitis B vaccinations among Vietnamese-American children and adolescents in Houston and Dallas.休斯顿和达拉斯越南裔美国儿童及青少年中乙肝疫苗推广的经济分析。
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 1):1289-96. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.6.1289.
10
Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.重新审视基于社区的健康促进：前景、成效与潜力。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):557-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.557.
本文引用的文献
1
The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review.异常社会心理学研究的统计功效：一项综述。
J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1962 Sep;65:145-53. doi: 10.1037/h0045186.
2
The Mpowerment Project: a community-level HIV prevention intervention for young gay men.“Mpowerment项目”：一项针对年轻男同性恋者的社区层面的艾滋病毒预防干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Aug;86(8):1129-36. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1129.
3
The tribulations of trials--intervention in communities.试验的磨难——社区干预
Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):156-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.156.
Zotero 插件