Suppr超能文献

常规粪便微生物学的使用与滥用:美国病理学家学会对601家机构的Q-probes研究

The use and abuse of routine stool microbiology: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 601 institutions.

作者信息

Valenstein P, Pfaller M, Yungbluth M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Catherine McAuley Health Systems, Ann Arbor MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Feb;120(2):206-11.

PMID:8712901
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficiency with which physicians use routine stool microbiology tests.

DESIGN

Questionnaire and structured review of 100 consecutive stool bacteriology and parasitology examinations at each participating institution.

SETTING

Six hundred one institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-probes Program.

RESULTS

Of 59500 bacteriology specimens, 3808 (6.4%) contained a pathogen. The vast majority (99%) of bacterial pathogens were detected in either the first or second specimen submitted. Almost 40% of inpatient specimens were collected after the third day of hospitalization, but only 0.6% of these specimens were positive for enteric pathogens that had not been previously recovered. More than half of the laboratories reported having no limits on the number of bacteriology specimens per patient that could be submitted for testing, and fewer than 8% of laboratories rejected specimens from inpatients after a certain number of days in the hospital. The frequency with which laboratories performed tests for Clostridium difficile varied widely. Of 58500 parasitology specimens, 1463 (2.5%) contained a pathogen; 97.6% of pathogens were detected by the second stool specimen, and 99.8% were detected by the third specimen. Only 0.7% of specimens from inpatients hospitalized more than 4 days contained a new pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that no more than two bacteriology specimens and no more that two or three parasitology specimens be processed per patient without consultation. Standard stool examination for a bacterial pathogens has a low yield and should not be performed after 3 days of hospitalization. Likewise, parasitology examinations should not be performed after 4 days of hospitalization.

摘要

目的

研究医生使用常规粪便微生物检测的效率。

设计

对各参与机构连续100例粪便细菌学和寄生虫学检查进行问卷调查及结构化回顾。

机构

601家参与美国病理学家学会Q-probes项目的机构。

结果

在59500份细菌学标本中,3808份(6.4%)含有病原体。绝大多数(99%)细菌病原体在提交的第一份或第二份标本中被检测到。近40%的住院患者标本在住院第三天后采集,但这些标本中只有0.6%对先前未检出的肠道病原体呈阳性。超过一半的实验室报告称,对每位患者可提交检测的细菌学标本数量没有限制,且不到8%的实验室在患者住院一定天数后拒收标本。各实验室进行艰难梭菌检测的频率差异很大。在58500份寄生虫学标本中,1463份(2.5%)含有病原体;97.6%的病原体在第二份粪便标本中被检测到,99.8%在第三份标本中被检测到。住院超过4天的患者标本中只有0.7%含有新病原体。

结论

我们建议,未经会诊,每位患者处理的细菌学标本不应超过两份,寄生虫学标本不应超过两到三份。常规粪便细菌病原体检查的阳性率较低,住院3天后不应进行。同样,住院4天后不应进行寄生虫学检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验