• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规粪便微生物学的使用与滥用:美国病理学家学会对601家机构的Q-probes研究

The use and abuse of routine stool microbiology: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 601 institutions.

作者信息

Valenstein P, Pfaller M, Yungbluth M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Catherine McAuley Health Systems, Ann Arbor MI 48106, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Feb;120(2):206-11.

PMID:8712901
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficiency with which physicians use routine stool microbiology tests.

DESIGN

Questionnaire and structured review of 100 consecutive stool bacteriology and parasitology examinations at each participating institution.

SETTING

Six hundred one institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-probes Program.

RESULTS

Of 59500 bacteriology specimens, 3808 (6.4%) contained a pathogen. The vast majority (99%) of bacterial pathogens were detected in either the first or second specimen submitted. Almost 40% of inpatient specimens were collected after the third day of hospitalization, but only 0.6% of these specimens were positive for enteric pathogens that had not been previously recovered. More than half of the laboratories reported having no limits on the number of bacteriology specimens per patient that could be submitted for testing, and fewer than 8% of laboratories rejected specimens from inpatients after a certain number of days in the hospital. The frequency with which laboratories performed tests for Clostridium difficile varied widely. Of 58500 parasitology specimens, 1463 (2.5%) contained a pathogen; 97.6% of pathogens were detected by the second stool specimen, and 99.8% were detected by the third specimen. Only 0.7% of specimens from inpatients hospitalized more than 4 days contained a new pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that no more than two bacteriology specimens and no more that two or three parasitology specimens be processed per patient without consultation. Standard stool examination for a bacterial pathogens has a low yield and should not be performed after 3 days of hospitalization. Likewise, parasitology examinations should not be performed after 4 days of hospitalization.

摘要

目的

研究医生使用常规粪便微生物检测的效率。

设计

对各参与机构连续100例粪便细菌学和寄生虫学检查进行问卷调查及结构化回顾。

机构

601家参与美国病理学家学会Q-probes项目的机构。

结果

在59500份细菌学标本中,3808份(6.4%)含有病原体。绝大多数(99%)细菌病原体在提交的第一份或第二份标本中被检测到。近40%的住院患者标本在住院第三天后采集,但这些标本中只有0.6%对先前未检出的肠道病原体呈阳性。超过一半的实验室报告称,对每位患者可提交检测的细菌学标本数量没有限制,且不到8%的实验室在患者住院一定天数后拒收标本。各实验室进行艰难梭菌检测的频率差异很大。在58500份寄生虫学标本中,1463份(2.5%)含有病原体;97.6%的病原体在第二份粪便标本中被检测到,99.8%在第三份标本中被检测到。住院超过4天的患者标本中只有0.7%含有新病原体。

结论

我们建议,未经会诊,每位患者处理的细菌学标本不应超过两份,寄生虫学标本不应超过两到三份。常规粪便细菌病原体检查的阳性率较低,住院3天后不应进行。同样,住院4天后不应进行寄生虫学检查。

相似文献

1
The use and abuse of routine stool microbiology: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 601 institutions.常规粪便微生物学的使用与滥用:美国病理学家学会对601家机构的Q-probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Feb;120(2):206-11.
2
Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.外科病理报告的实验室内部及时性。美国病理学家学会两项关于活检和复杂标本的Q-Probes研究结果。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Mar;120(3):234-44.
3
Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.乳腺X线引导下的乳房活检:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对434家机构中临床医生期望以及标本处理和报告特征的研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jan;121(1):11-8.
4
Timeliness of urinalysis: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 346 small hospitals.尿液分析的及时性:美国病理学家学会对346家小型医院的Q-调查研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jul;121(7):667-72.
5
Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.机构间床边血糖监测项目特征、准确性表现及质量控制文件的比较:美国病理学家学会Q-Probes对226家小型医院床边血糖监测的研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Jun;122(6):495-502.
6
Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.1990年至1993年急诊科周转时间表现的变化。两项美国病理学家学会Q-探针研究的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Oct;121(10):1031-41.
7
Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals.手术活检诊断周转时间的机构间比较:美国病理学家学会对157家小医院的5384例手术活检进行的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Nov;122(11):951-6.
8
Complete blood count specimen acceptability. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 703 laboratories.全血细胞计数样本的可接受性。美国病理学家学会对703个实验室进行的Q-Probes研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Mar;119(3):203-8.
9
Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories.化学检验样本的可接受性:美国病理学家学会对453家实验室的Q-Probes研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jan;121(1):19-26.
10
[Clostridium difficile diarrhea: frequency of detection in a medical center in Buenos Aires, Argentina].[艰难梭菌腹泻:在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯一家医疗中心的检出频率]
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2001 Apr-Jun;33(2):101-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Heat, water and the fateful photo.高温、水与那张决定性的照片。
Breathe (Sheff). 2024 Mar;20(1):230182. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0182-2023. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Stool cultures at the ICU: get rid of it!重症监护病房的粪便培养:摒弃它!
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Jan 18;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0358-x.
3
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Stool Cultures and Parasitological Studies in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者粪便培养和寄生虫学研究的临床决策支持工具的实施。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec;55(12):3350-3354. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01052-17. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Optimizing Test Utilization in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Tools and Opportunities.优化临床微生物实验室的检测利用:工具与机遇。
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec;55(12):3321-3323. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01332-17. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
5
[Gastrointestinal infections].
Internist (Berl). 2017 Feb;58(2):149-169. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0183-y.
6
[Diagnostic workup and therapy of infectious diarrhea. Current standards].[感染性腹泻的诊断检查与治疗。现行标准]
Internist (Berl). 2015 Dec;56(12):1353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00108-015-3756-2.
7
Diagnostic yields in solid organ transplant recipients admitted with diarrhea.因腹泻入院的实体器官移植受者的诊断率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):729-37. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu880. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
8
Culturing stool specimens for Campylobacter spp., Pennsylvania, USA.对粪便标本进行弯曲菌属培养,美国宾夕法尼亚州。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;18(3):484-7. doi: 10.3201/eid1803.111266.
9
Physician use of parasite tests in the United States from 1997 to 2006 and in a Utah Cryptosporidium outbreak in 2007.1997 年至 2006 年美国医生使用寄生虫检测以及 2007 年犹他州隐孢子虫病爆发期间的使用情况。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):591-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01806-10. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Recognition and prevention of hospital-associated enteric infections in the intensive care unit.识别和预防重症监护病房中的医院相关性肠内感染。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8 Suppl):S324-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e69f05.