Suppr超能文献

[高危患者内镜下植入内支架姑息治疗大胆管结石]

[Palliative treatment of large bile duct stones by endoscopic implantation of endoprosthesis in high risk patients].

作者信息

Döbrönte Z, Patai A

机构信息

Vas Megyei Markusovszky Kórház, II. sz. Belgyógyászati Osztály.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 1996 Mar 3;137(9):461-4.

PMID:8714039
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Endoscopic insertion of biliary stents is an established method in the palliative treatment of malignant bile duct stenoses. However, there is less experience concerning the long term effect of endoprostheses in patients with large bile duct stones.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Straight polyethylen endoprostheses of 12 Fr diameter were transpapillary placed because of large bile duct stones in 25 patients during a 5-year-period. The stents were inserted for transitoric decompression and for permanent treatment in 2 and 23 cases, respectively. Unsuccessful endoscopic stone removal (inc. mechanical lithotripsy) in high risk patients or extremely limited tolerability of patients during the endoscopic procedure were regarded as indications of stenting. The patients were followed clinically, biochemically and endoscopically for a period of 6 months to 5 years (mean 22.7 months).

RESULTS

No early complication was observed. Late cholangitis occurred in three patients due to endoprosthesis dislodging and clogging in two cases and one, resp. All complications were successfully managed by endoscopic route. In further three patients elective stent exchange was performed. 8 patients died during the follow-up period, the cause of death was independent of gallstone disease in all cases. Without any stent exchange, 13 patients are symptom-free for 6-60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endoprothesis placement is a simple, cost-effective, relatively safe and well tolerable method for transitoric biliary decompression and for long term treatment in high risk patients with endoscopically not removable large bile duct stones. In contrast with malignant stenoses, in cases of bile duct stones elective exchange of the stent is not necessary, only clinical and biochemical follow-up suggested.

摘要

未标注

内镜下插入胆道支架是恶性胆管狭窄姑息治疗的一种成熟方法。然而,对于大胆管结石患者,关于内支架长期效果的经验较少。

患者与方法

在5年期间,因大胆管结石,对25例患者经乳头放置了直径为12F的直聚乙烯内支架。支架分别用于临时减压和永久治疗,各2例和23例。高危患者内镜下取石失败(包括机械碎石术)或内镜操作期间患者耐受性极差被视为支架置入的指征。对患者进行了6个月至5年(平均22.7个月)的临床、生化和内镜随访。

结果

未观察到早期并发症。3例患者发生晚期胆管炎,分别是由于内支架移位和堵塞各2例和1例。所有并发症均通过内镜途径成功处理。另有3例患者进行了择期支架置换。8例患者在随访期间死亡,所有病例的死亡原因均与胆结石疾病无关。13例患者未进行任何支架置换,6至60个月无症状。

结论

内镜下放置内支架是一种简单、经济有效、相对安全且耐受性良好的方法,可用于大胆管结石内镜无法取出的高危患者的临时胆道减压和长期治疗。与恶性狭窄不同,对于胆管结石病例,无需择期更换支架,仅建议进行临床和生化随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验