Cameron C
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1996 Jun;5(2):81-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1996.tb00213.x.
There is much controversy surrounding the issue of nurses in the role of patient advocate. Cancer patients are vulnerable due to their diagnoses, the anxiety that it generates, the nature of the disease and subsequent treatment and may diminished autonomy as a result. It is questionable whether the nurse is able to promote the best interest of the patient in this situation. Models of advocacy and the nurse-patient relationship are discussed. The main arguments for taking on the role of patient advocate include: reference to long periods of time spent with patient and the chance to build a relationship; on duty to care and the duty to do no harm. Criticisms of the appropriateness of advocacy role for nurses include: inability for the patient to choose his or her nurse; promotion of self interests; charges of paternalism; challenges from other health care professionals and multiple and/or conflicting obligations. It is concluded that perhaps the most ethical way of caring is by empowering patients and promoting self-advocacy. This concept needs to be further explored.
围绕护士作为患者权益倡导者这一角色存在诸多争议。癌症患者因其诊断结果、所产生的焦虑、疾病的性质及后续治疗而处于脆弱状态,可能因此导致自主性降低。在这种情况下,护士是否能够促进患者的最大利益值得怀疑。文中讨论了倡导模式及护患关系。承担患者权益倡导者角色的主要论据包括:提及与患者相处的长时间以及建立关系的机会;护理职责和不造成伤害的职责。对护士担任倡导者角色的适当性的批评包括:患者无法选择自己的护士;追求自身利益;家长式作风的指控;来自其他医护专业人员的挑战以及多重和/或相互冲突的义务。结论是,或许最符合伦理的护理方式是赋予患者权力并促进自我倡导。这一概念需要进一步探讨。