• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将尸检要求与当代认证过程相关联。

Relating autopsy requirements to the contemporary accreditation process.

作者信息

O'Leary D S

机构信息

Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, Ill. 60181, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Aug;120(8):763-6.

PMID:8718903
Abstract

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has long been a strong proponent of the autopsy. Standards related to autopsies are clearly set forth in the current manual for hospitals. However, radical changes in the health care environment and in the philosophy of accreditation are placing the use of autopsy results in a new context. In that context, autopsy results are competing with other performance measures as drivers of quality improvement, and the autopsy itself is competing for scarce resources. A successful outcome will require autopsy advocates to persuade key audiences (viz, consumers, purchasers, and hospital executives) that autopsy findings lead to substantive improvements in the delivery of care, and that the autopsy is more worthy of support than other sources of performance data.

摘要

长期以来,医疗组织认证联合委员会一直大力支持尸体解剖。当前的医院手册中明确规定了与尸体解剖相关的标准。然而,医疗环境和认证理念的根本性变化正将尸体解剖结果置于新的背景之下。在这种背景下,尸体解剖结果正与其他绩效指标竞争,以推动质量改进,而尸体解剖本身也在争夺稀缺资源。要取得成功,尸体解剖的倡导者需要说服关键受众(即消费者、购买者和医院管理人员),使他们相信尸体解剖结果能切实改善医疗服务的提供,并且尸体解剖比其他绩效数据来源更值得支持。

相似文献

1
Relating autopsy requirements to the contemporary accreditation process.将尸检要求与当代认证过程相关联。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Aug;120(8):763-6.
2
Corrections to the 1991 Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (AMH). Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
Jt Comm Perspect. 1990 Nov-Dec;10(6):B1-3.
3
The role of accreditation in quality oversight and improvement under healthcare reform.医疗改革背景下认证在质量监督与改进中的作用。
Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993;5(10):11-4.
4
[Accreditation of hospitals in the USA according to the standards of the Joint Commission of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)--reflections on the transferability of these procedures to Germany].[根据医疗保健组织联合委员会(JCAHO)的标准对美国医院进行认证——关于这些程序向德国转移的思考]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Sep;94(8):665-8.
5
Accrediting organizations and quality improvement.认证机构与质量改进。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Oct;6(10):1117-30.
6
Trends in health care practitioner credentialing.医疗保健从业者资格认证的趋势。
J Health Care Finance. 1998 Spring;24(3):66-70.
7
Three hospitals' survey experiences.三家医院的调查经历。
J Healthc Qual. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):14-9.
8
The evolving role of the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.医疗保健组织认证联合委员会不断演变的角色。
Am J Med Qual. 1996 Spring;11(1):S54-7.
9
Health plan accreditation: NCQA, JCAHO, or both?健康计划认证:国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)、医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO),还是两者兼具?
Manag Care Q. 1998 Autumn;6(4):52-61.
10
[Accreditation standards in health care].[医疗保健中的认证标准]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Sep 16;164(38):4408-11.