• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健从业者资格认证的趋势。

Trends in health care practitioner credentialing.

作者信息

Hernandez A M

机构信息

Aperture Credentialing, Inc., Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 1998 Spring;24(3):66-70.

PMID:9502058
Abstract

Once a risk management process limited to hospitals, the practice of practitioner credentialing has expanded to include many other health care organizations, including insurers, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, management services organizations, medical groups, and independent practice associations. Standards set by recognized accreditation bodies, including the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (Joint Commission), National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and American Accreditation Health Care Commission/Utilization Review Accreditation Committee mandate a substantial effort to properly evaluate the credentials of health care practitioners. A sector of commerce called the credentials verification organization (CVO) industry has undertaken the mission to make the process of practitioner credentialing more consistent and efficient, faster, and less expensive.

摘要

从业者资格认证曾经是仅限于医院的风险管理流程,如今已扩展至包括保险公司、健康维护组织、优选医疗机构、管理服务组织、医疗集团和独立执业协会等在内的许多其他医疗保健机构。包括医疗保健组织认证联合委员会(联合委员会)、国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)以及美国医疗保健认证委员会/利用审查认证委员会在内的公认认证机构制定的标准,要求做出大量努力以恰当地评估医疗保健从业者的资格。一个名为资格验证组织(CVO)行业的商业领域承担起了使从业者资格认证过程更加一致、高效、快速且成本更低的使命。

相似文献

1
Trends in health care practitioner credentialing.医疗保健从业者资格认证的趋势。
J Health Care Finance. 1998 Spring;24(3):66-70.
2
Accrediting organizations and quality improvement.认证机构与质量改进。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Oct;6(10):1117-30.
3
A clever disguise? Associations unite to call for universal PPO standards, but endorsement could hurt JCAHO.一个巧妙的伪装?各协会联合呼吁制定通用的优先提供者组织(PPO)标准,但获得认可可能会损害医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO)。
Mod Healthc. 2002 Feb 11;32(6):10-1.
4
Evaluating credentials verification organizations: who is responsible?评估资质验证机构:谁来负责?
Jt Comm Perspect. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):6-7.
5
Quality assessment and health care reform: the view from the Joint Commission.质量评估与医疗改革:来自联合委员会的观点
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):107-14.
6
Credentialing and "deselection" of providers in healthcare delivery systems.医疗服务提供系统中医疗服务提供者的资格认定与“淘汰”
J Health Hosp Law. 1998 Winter;31(1):1-13.
7
Health plan accreditation: NCQA, JCAHO, or both?健康计划认证:国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)、医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO),还是两者兼具?
Manag Care Q. 1998 Autumn;6(4):52-61.
8
Groups vie for lucrative managed care accreditation business.各团体争夺利润丰厚的管理式医疗认证业务。
Hospitals. 1990 Apr 5;64(7):35-6, 38.
9
Private credentialing of health care personnel: an antitrust perspective. Part Two.医疗保健人员的私人资格认证:反垄断视角。第二部分。
Am J Law Med. 1983 Fall;9(3):263-334.
10
Do you meet credentialing standards?你是否符合资质标准?
OR Manager. 2000 Nov;16(11):27-8, 32.

引用本文的文献

1
Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention.诊断性颈脑血管造影、颈动脉支架置入术和脑血管介入治疗的培训、能力和认证标准。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(10):1732-41.