Rugg M D, Soardi M, Doyle M C
Wellcome Brain Research Group, University of St Andrews, UK.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1995 Dec;3(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00014-3.
In experiment 1, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 13 scalp sites while subjects viewed a series of line drawings of novel objects. Most of the drawings were of objects that were structurally possible, while the remainder were of structurally impossible objects; the task was to respond to each presentation of an impossible object. Approximately one third of the possible objects were repetitions of the immediately preceding drawing. Compared to the ERPs elicited by first presentations, the ERPs elicited by repetitions were more negative-going. This negative repetition effect comprised two temporally and topographically distinct components. In experiment 2, subjects monitored drawings of unstructured patterns, so as to detect occasional 'targets' containing a pair of parallel lines. Repetitions of 'non-target' patterns elicited ERPs which were largely indistinguishable from those elicited by first presentations. Thus, the negative repetition effects found in experiment 1 are not merely a consequence of repeating visual patterns in a demanding discrimination task. Possible reasons why novel objects should elicit ERP repetition effects opposite in polarity to those observed in tasks employing verbal or meaningful pictorial stimuli are discussed.
在实验1中,当受试者观看一系列新奇物体的线条画时,从13个头皮部位记录了事件相关电位(ERP)。大多数画作是结构上可能存在的物体,其余的则是结构上不可能存在的物体;任务是对每一个不可能物体的呈现做出反应。大约三分之一的可能物体是前一幅画作的重复。与首次呈现引发的ERP相比,重复呈现引发的ERP更偏向负向。这种负向重复效应包括两个在时间和地形上不同的成分。在实验2中,受试者监测无结构图案的画作,以便检测偶尔出现的包含一对平行线的“目标”。“非目标”图案的重复引发的ERP与首次呈现引发的ERP在很大程度上难以区分。因此,实验1中发现的负向重复效应不仅仅是在要求较高的辨别任务中重复视觉图案的结果。文中讨论了新奇物体引发的ERP重复效应在极性上与使用语言或有意义的图片刺激的任务中观察到的效应相反的可能原因。