Farrell M P, Barnes G M, Banerjee S
Department of Sociology, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.
J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Dec;36(4):377-85.
In this paper we examine the degree to which family cohesion buffers the effects of fathers' problem drinking at Time 1 (T1) on adolescent distress, deviance, and heavy drinking at Time 2 (T2), one year later. Data from a representative sample of 658 families were used to test the hypotheses. Mothers, fathers (if present), and adolescent children were interviewed in the home. Fathers who were present completed self-report scales measuring problem drinking. When fathers were not available, mothers' reports on fathers' drinking were used to measure fathers' problem drinking. Results from regression analysis indicate that after controlling for the effects of race, SES, age, gender, and family structure: (1) the more cohesion in the family and the fever stressful events, the less distress, deviance, and heavy drinking shown by adolescents; (2) the fathers' problem drinking affects adolescent distress and deviance when cohesion is low; but as cohesion increases, the effects of the fathers' drinking are reduced. The findings support the hypothesis that cohesion in families buffers the effects of fathers' problem drinking on adolescents.
在本文中,我们考察了家庭凝聚力在多大程度上缓冲了父亲在时间1(T1)的问题饮酒行为对一年后的时间2(T2)青少年苦恼、偏差行为和酗酒问题的影响。来自658个家庭的代表性样本数据被用于检验这些假设。母亲、父亲(如果在场)和青少年子女在家中接受了访谈。在场的父亲完成了测量问题饮酒的自我报告量表。当父亲不在场时,母亲对父亲饮酒情况的报告被用于衡量父亲的问题饮酒行为。回归分析结果表明,在控制了种族、社会经济地位、年龄、性别和家庭结构的影响后:(1)家庭凝聚力越强,压力事件越少,青少年表现出的苦恼、偏差行为和酗酒问题就越少;(2)当凝聚力较低时,父亲的问题饮酒会影响青少年的苦恼和偏差行为;但随着凝聚力的增加,父亲饮酒的影响会减小。这些发现支持了这样的假设,即家庭凝聚力缓冲了父亲问题饮酒对青少年的影响。