Suppr超能文献

表型和基因型指纹图谱方法在烟曲霉菌株鉴定中的应用。

Use of phenotypic and genotypic fingerprinting methods in the strain identification of Aspergillus fumigatus.

作者信息

Rath P M, Marggraf G, Dermoumi H, Ansorg R

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie der Universität-GH, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Mycoses. 1995 Nov-Dec;38(11-12):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00015.x.

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus isolates (n = 6) from a lung transplant recipient, one isolate from a patient who had been on the same ward and a reference strain (NCPF 2140) were compared using three typing methods: SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting with serum from the transplant patient and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay. Neither the SDS-PAGE, immunoblot nor RAPD assay with single primers revealed differences between the eight isolates. Digestion of one primer product with the endonuclease EcoRI discriminated between the six patient isolates and the other two strains. The RAPD assay using pairwise combined primers showed identical patterns for the patient's strains but differentiated between the two other strains. It is concluded that any single technique may fail to detect strain differences and that a spectrum of typing methods is necessary in order to reveal or to exclude cross-infections with Aspergillus fumigatus.

摘要

使用三种分型方法对来自一名肺移植受者的烟曲霉分离株(n = 6)、来自同一病房一名患者的一株分离株以及一株参考菌株(NCPF 2140)进行了比较:十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)、用移植患者血清进行免疫印迹以及随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析。SDS-PAGE、免疫印迹或单引物RAPD分析均未显示这八株分离株之间存在差异。用核酸内切酶EcoRI消化一种引物产物可区分六株患者分离株和其他两株菌株。使用成对组合引物的RAPD分析显示患者菌株具有相同的图谱,但可区分其他两株菌株。得出的结论是,任何单一技术都可能无法检测到菌株差异,为了揭示或排除烟曲霉的交叉感染,需要一系列分型方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验