Rassweiler J J, Henkel T O, Stock C, Seemann O, Frede T, Alken P
Department of Urology, Stadtkrankenhaus Heilbronn, Germany.
Lymphology. 1996 Mar;29(1):36-44.
We describe our experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 19 patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Twelve patients had stage I disease with no clinical evidence (CT-scan, ultrasound, tumor markers) of metastases; 7 patients (stage IIb=2, stage IIc=5) had residual tumor after chemotherapy but with negative tumor markers. A laparoscopic dissection was used to asses more fully the pathologic status of the relevant retroperitoneal lymph nodes of both groups. The patient was positioned and trocars introduced at sites similar to that used for transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (flank position, five ports - 3 x 10 mm; 2 x 5 mm). After reflecting the colon anteromedially, the landmarks of the lymph node dissection were isolated-namely the ureter, aorta, inferior vena cava, and both renal veins. The lymph node dissection included the paracaval, interaorto-caval, upper preaortic, and right common iliac zonal nodes for right-sided tumors, and paraaortic, upper preaortic zones for left-sided tumors. Retrieval of the lymph nodal chains was accomplished using a small organ bag. The mean duration of the procedure was 298 (range 150-405) minutes. In only one patient was a lymph node positive for tumor (stage I). Otherwise nodes showed extensive necrosis (after chemotherapy). No intraoperative complications were encountered but three patients developed a delayed complication (ureteral stenosis, pulmonary embolism, and retrograde ejaculation, respectively). Whereas we completed the dissection in each patient with stage I tumors, the laparoscopic procedure was more difficult in patients with stage II tumors after chemotherapy. In two patients with stage IIb disease laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was successful. In four other patients parts of the dissection had to be done after conversion to an open (conventional) operation using a small incision (suprainguinal or pararectal); in one patient the laparoscopic approach was abandoned and converted to an open operation. In the post-chemotherapy group the outcome depended primarily on the tumor bulk prior to drug treatment. In two patients in whom all residual necrotic tissue was removed laparoscopically they had "minor" disease (stage IIb); the others had stage IIc tumors. Our preliminary experience suggests that a modified laparoscopic lymph node dissection is feasible for stage I tumors and in selected patients with marker negative residual tumor after chemotherapy (stage IIb).
我们描述了19例非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者行腹腔镜腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的经验。12例患者为Ⅰ期疾病,无转移的临床证据(CT扫描、超声、肿瘤标志物);7例患者(Ⅱb期=2例,Ⅱc期=5例)化疗后有残留肿瘤,但肿瘤标志物为阴性。采用腹腔镜清扫术更全面地评估两组患者相关腹膜后淋巴结的病理状态。患者取与经腹腹腔镜肾切除术相同的体位,穿刺点与经腹腹腔镜肾切除术相似(侧卧位,5个穿刺孔——3个10mm;2个5mm)。将结肠向前内侧翻转后,分离淋巴结清扫的标志——即输尿管、主动脉、下腔静脉和双侧肾静脉。淋巴结清扫包括右侧肿瘤的腔静脉旁、主动脉腔静脉间、主动脉前上和右髂总区域淋巴结,以及左侧肿瘤的主动脉旁、主动脉前上区域淋巴结。使用一个小器官袋取出淋巴结链。手术平均持续时间为298(150 - 405)分钟。仅1例患者的淋巴结有肿瘤阳性(Ⅰ期)。其他情况下淋巴结显示广泛坏死(化疗后)。术中未发生并发症,但3例患者出现了延迟并发症(分别为输尿管狭窄、肺栓塞和逆行射精)。虽然我们完成了每例Ⅰ期肿瘤患者的清扫,但化疗后Ⅱ期肿瘤患者的腹腔镜手术操作更困难。2例Ⅱb期疾病患者的腹腔镜淋巴结切除术成功。另外4例患者部分清扫术在转为小切口(腹股沟上或直肠旁)开放(传统)手术后完成;1例患者放弃腹腔镜入路,转为开放手术。在化疗后组,结果主要取决于药物治疗前肿瘤的大小。2例经腹腔镜切除所有残留坏死组织的患者为“微小”疾病(Ⅱb期);其他患者为Ⅱc期肿瘤。我们的初步经验表明,改良腹腔镜淋巴结清扫术对于Ⅰ期肿瘤以及化疗后部分肿瘤标志物阴性的残留肿瘤患者(Ⅱb期)是可行的。