Costa L G
Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Seattle 98105, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Mar;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):55-67. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s155.
There is an increasing interest in the development and validation of biomarkers for use in biochemical/molecular epidemiological studies. Though the area of neurotoxicology has received much attention in the past several years, it still lags behind with regard to the development of biomarkers, particularly those of health effects and susceptibility. This review discusses several aspects of biomarker research as it relates to neurotoxic compounds and focuses on selected agents (organophosphorus insecticides, styrene, n-hexane, carbon disulfide, acrylamide), which have been the subject of a number of investigations in animals and humans. While traditional biomonitoring approaches and novel techniques (e.g., hemoglobin adducts) provide several measurements for monitoring exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, potential markers of genetic susceptibility have been seldom investigated in a neurotoxicology context. Furthermore, the complexity of the nervous system, together with the multiplicity of end points and the limited knowledge of the exact mechanism(s) of action of neurotoxicants, has led to only limited advancements in the development of biomarkers for neurotoxic effects. Significant progress in this area will depend upon an increased understanding of the cellular, biochemical, and molecular targets directly involved in neurotoxicity.
用于生化/分子流行病学研究的生物标志物的开发和验证越来越受到关注。尽管神经毒理学领域在过去几年中受到了很多关注,但在生物标志物的开发方面仍然滞后,尤其是那些与健康影响和易感性相关的生物标志物。本综述讨论了与神经毒性化合物相关的生物标志物研究的几个方面,并重点关注了选定的物质(有机磷杀虫剂、苯乙烯、正己烷、二硫化碳、丙烯酰胺),这些物质已成为动物和人类多项研究的主题。虽然传统的生物监测方法和新技术(如血红蛋白加合物)提供了多种监测神经毒性化学物质暴露的测量方法,但在神经毒理学背景下,很少研究潜在的遗传易感性标志物。此外,神经系统的复杂性,加上终点的多样性以及对神经毒物确切作用机制的了解有限,导致神经毒性效应生物标志物的开发进展有限。该领域的重大进展将取决于对直接参与神经毒性的细胞、生化和分子靶点有更多的了解。