Maderuelo Fernández J A, Carriedo Ule E, Serrano Temprano M, Almaraz Gómez A, Berjón Barrientos A C
UDMFYC de Salamanca, Universidad de Valladolid.
Aten Primaria. 1996 Mar 31;17(5):348-52.
To study the causes of the disagreement between the general atmosphere of insatisfaction inherent in the assistance offered by the health care system and the favourable evaluation that the public shows in the questionnaires carried out in the field of primary health care. The less satisfactory issues of the health service offert are also identified.
A Delphi thecnique has been used as consensus method.
Community setting: Salamanca urban area.
The Delphi group is made up of people working in jobs with a pronounced social character: members of neighbour associations, educators, social workers, etc. Three consecutive questionnaires were distributed among fifty people. Twenty-seven of them completed the three rounds.
The score of the reasons of disagreement perceived as the most important were: the difficulties of access at a specialised level, 8.3 points; the inequality of the services offered by the two organizative models that coexist in the primary health care, 7.1; the lack of discrimination between the primary and the specialized level, 6.8. The highest scores were for the following complaints: excessive waiting lists at the second care level (8.5), delay in solving the problems (7.8) and masification at the consultancy (7.1). The most satisfactory aspects are the possibility of free choice of doctor, 7.9 points; the previous appointement system, 7.6; and a reliable relationship with the doctor, 7.3.
To take into account these factors in the future design and interpretation of inquiries will increase their information validity and usefulness.
研究医疗保健系统所提供服务中内在的普遍不满氛围与公众在初级卫生保健领域进行的问卷调查中所表现出的积极评价之间存在差异的原因。同时确定卫生服务提供中不太令人满意的问题。
采用德尔菲技术作为达成共识的方法。
社区环境:萨拉曼卡市区。
德尔菲小组由从事具有明显社会性质工作的人员组成:邻里协会成员、教育工作者、社会工作者等。连续向50人发放了三份问卷。其中27人完成了三轮调查。
被认为最重要的分歧原因得分如下:专科层面的就医困难,8.3分;初级卫生保健中并存的两种组织模式所提供服务的不平等,7.1分;初级和专科层面之间缺乏区分,6.8分。以下投诉得分最高:二级护理层面等候名单过长(8.5分)、解决问题延迟(7.8分)和咨询处人员过多(7.1分)。最令人满意的方面是可以自由选择医生,7.9分;提前预约系统,7.6分;以及与医生建立可靠的关系,7.3分。
在未来调查的设计和解读中考虑这些因素将提高其信息的有效性和实用性。