Kaye L W, Davitt J K
Graduate School of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College, PA 19010, USA.
Health Soc Work. 1995 Nov;20(4):262-71. doi: 10.1093/hsw/20.4.262.
This study, based on data from 154 home health care agencies, examines the comparative profiles of traditional and technology-enhanced, or "high-tech", home health care service providers and recipients. Voluntary, not-for-profit agencies have been providing services the longest, serve more patients, make more home visits, and have more staff. However, proprietary programs have grown faster than agencies under other auspices. One in 10 patients receives high-tech care, with hospice agencies serving the largest proportion of high-tech patients. High-tech patients are more likely to be younger, male, married, white, and living with others than other service recipients in general. A slight majority of agencies have special admissions criteria for high-tech patients. Variations in the profiles of traditional and high-tech patients are considered in terms of their implications for differential access to particular categories of in-home services.
本研究基于154家家庭医疗保健机构的数据,考察了传统型和技术增强型(即“高科技”)家庭医疗保健服务提供者及接受者的对比概况。自愿性非营利机构提供服务的时间最长,服务的患者更多,进行的家访更多,且员工更多。然而,营利性项目的增长速度比其他赞助形式的机构更快。每10名患者中有1名接受高科技护理,临终关怀机构服务的高科技患者比例最大。总体而言,高科技患者比其他服务接受者更有可能年轻、男性、已婚、白人且与他人同住。略超过半数的机构对高科技患者有特殊的入院标准。从传统患者和高科技患者概况差异对获得特定类别的居家服务机会差异的影响方面进行了考量。