Suppr超能文献

美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗作为癌症粒细胞缺乏患者发热经验性治疗的比较。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织国际抗菌治疗合作组及意大利成人恶性血液病研究组感染项目。

Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program.

作者信息

Cometta A, Calandra T, Gaya H, Zinner S H, de Bock R, Del Favero A, Bucaneve G, Crokaert F, Kern W V, Klastersky J, Langenaeken I, Micozzi A, Padmos A, Paesmans M, Viscoli C, Glauser M P

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 May;40(5):1108-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1108.

Abstract

Combinations of beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides have been standard therapy for suspected infections in granulocytopenic cancer patients, especially those with profound long-lasting granulocytopenia. With the advent of new broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins or carbapenems, the need to combine beta-lactams with aminoglycosides became more controversial. The objective of this prospective randomized multicenter study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of meropenem monotherapy with those of the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empirical treatment of fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Of 1,034 randomized patients, 958 were assessable in the intent-to-treat analysis for response to antibacterial therapy, including 483 in the meropenem group and 475 in the ceftazidime-plus-amikacin group. The median durations of neutropenia were 16 and 17 days, respectively. A successful outcome was reported in 270 of 483 (56%) patients treated with monotherapy compared with 245 of 475 (52%) patients treated with the combination group (P = 0.20). The success rates in the monotherapy group and the combination group were similar by type of infection (single gram-negative bacteremia, single gram-positive bacteremia, clinically documented infection, and possible infection). The occurrence of further infections assessed in patients for whom the allocated regimen was not modified did not differ between the two groups (12% in both groups). Mortality due to the presenting infection or further infection was relatively low (8 patients treated with the monotherapy compared with 13 patients treated with the combination). A total of 1,027 patients were evaluable for adverse events; the proportion of those who developed adverse effects was similar between the two groups (29% in both groups), and only 19 (4%) patients in the monotherapy group and 31 (6%) in the combination group experienced an adverse event related or probably related to the study drug. Allergic reactions were the only reason for stopping the protocol antibiotic(s) (3 and 5 patients, respectively). This study confirms that monotherapy with meropenem is as effective as the combination of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the empiric treatment of fever in persistently granulocytopenic cancer patients, and both regimens were well tolerated.

摘要

β-内酰胺类药物与氨基糖苷类药物联合使用一直是粒细胞减少的癌症患者疑似感染的标准治疗方法,尤其是那些长期严重粒细胞减少的患者。随着新型广谱杀菌抗生素如广谱头孢菌素或碳青霉烯类药物的出现,将β-内酰胺类药物与氨基糖苷类药物联合使用的必要性变得更具争议性。这项前瞻性随机多中心研究的目的是比较美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗对粒细胞减少的癌症患者发热进行经验性治疗的疗效、安全性和耐受性。在1034例随机分组的患者中,958例可在意向性分析中评估对抗菌治疗的反应,其中美罗培南组483例,头孢他啶加阿米卡星组475例。中性粒细胞减少的中位持续时间分别为16天和17天。单药治疗的483例患者中有270例(56%)报告治疗成功,而联合治疗组的475例患者中有245例(52%)报告治疗成功(P = 0.20)。单药治疗组和联合治疗组按感染类型(单一革兰阴性菌血症、单一革兰阳性菌血症、临床记录感染和可能感染)的成功率相似。在未改变分配治疗方案的患者中评估的进一步感染发生率在两组之间没有差异(两组均为12%)。因当前感染或进一步感染导致的死亡率相对较低(单药治疗组8例患者,联合治疗组13例患者)。共有1027例患者可评估不良事件;两组出现不良反应的比例相似(两组均为29%),单药治疗组仅有19例(4%)患者和联合治疗组31例(6%)患者发生与研究药物相关或可能相关的不良事件。过敏反应是停止使用方案规定抗生素的唯一原因(分别为3例和5例患者)。这项研究证实,美罗培南单药治疗与头孢他啶加阿米卡星联合治疗对持续性粒细胞减少的癌症患者发热进行经验性治疗同样有效,且两种治疗方案耐受性良好。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的抗生素管理
Crit Care. 2014 Aug 13;18(5):480. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0480-6.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验