Suppr超能文献

头孢他啶与哌拉西林和妥布霉素用于癌症中性粒细胞减少患者发热的经验性治疗比较。一项多中心随机试验。洲际抗菌研究组。

Ceftazidime compared with piperacillin and tobramycin for the empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic patients with cancer. A multicenter randomized trial. The Intercontinental Antimicrobial Study Group.

作者信息

De Pauw B E, Deresinski S C, Feld R, Lane-Allman E F, Donnelly J P

机构信息

Division of Hematology, University Hospital St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 15;120(10):834-44. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-10-199405150-00004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare piperacillin and tobramycin with ceftazidime alone for the empiric treatment of fever in the neutropenic patient without evidence of skin infections or anaerobic infections.

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

PATIENTS

876 febrile, neutropenic episodes in 696 patients (83% acute leukemia or bone marrow transplantation); 92 episodes were excluded from analysis because of protocol violation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either intravenous ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) or piperacillin (12 to 18 g/d in 4 to 6 divided doses plus tobramycin (1.7 to 2.0 mg/kg body weight every 8 h). Treatment could be modified at any time at the discretion of the investigator.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of satisfactory response, eradication of the infecting organism, development of superinfections, and occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

As a single agent, ceftazidime was as effective as the combination of piperacillin and tobramycin (62.7% satisfactory responses compared with 61.1%; odds ratio, 1.07%; 95% Cl, 0.79 to 1.44; P > 0.2). Equivalent responses were also obtained in episodes of profound neutropenia (odds ratio, 0.76; Cl, 0.43 to 1.33; P > 0.2). Infectious mortality was 6% for ceftazidime and 8% for the combination therapy. Eradication of the infecting organisms was achieved in 79% of bacteremic episodes treated with ceftazidime compared with 68% of the episodes treated with the combination therapy (odds ratio, 1.76; Cl, 0.92 to 3.38; P = 0.08), and rates for gram-negative rod bacteremia were also similar (95% compared with 77%; odds ratio, 5.25; Cl, 1.0 to 27.5; P = 0.03). Superinfections developed in 38 episodes in each group. An adverse event occurred in 8% of episodes treated with ceftazidime compared with 20% of episodes treated with combination therapy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime alone was as effective but safer than the combination of piperacillin and tobramycin for the empiric treatment of febrile, neutropenic patients, even those with profound and prolonged granulocytopenia.

摘要

目的

比较哌拉西林与妥布霉素联合用药和单独使用头孢他啶对无皮肤感染或厌氧菌感染证据的中性粒细胞减少患者发热进行经验性治疗的效果。

设计

一项多中心、随机、对照试验。

患者

696例患者出现876次发热性中性粒细胞减少发作(83%为急性白血病或骨髓移植);92次发作因违反方案被排除在分析之外。

干预措施

患者接受静脉注射头孢他啶(每8小时2克)或哌拉西林(每日12至18克,分4至6次给药)加妥布霉素(每8小时1.7至2.0毫克/千克体重)。治疗可由研究者酌情随时调整。

测量指标

满意反应的百分比、感染病原体的清除情况、二重感染的发生情况以及不良事件的发生情况。

结果

作为单一药物,头孢他啶与哌拉西林和妥布霉素联合用药效果相当(满意反应率分别为62.7%和61.1%;优势比为1.07%;95%可信区间为0.79至1.44;P>0.2)。在严重中性粒细胞减少发作中也获得了相似的反应(优势比为0.76;可信区间为0.43至1.33;P>0.2)。头孢他啶治疗的感染死亡率为6%,联合治疗为8%。头孢他啶治疗的菌血症发作中79%的感染病原体得以清除,联合治疗组为68%(优势比为1.76;可信区间为0.92至3.38;P = 0.08),革兰氏阴性杆菌菌血症的发生率也相似(分别为95%和77%;优势比为5.25;可信区间为1.0至27.5;P = 0.03)。每组均有38次发作出现二重感染。头孢他啶治疗的发作中有8%发生不良事件,联合治疗组为20%(P<0.001)。

结论

对于发热性中性粒细胞减少患者,即使是那些严重且长期粒细胞减少的患者,单独使用头孢他啶进行经验性治疗与哌拉西林和妥布霉素联合用药效果相当,但更安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验