Suppr超能文献

在接受腹部子宫切除术的患者中,对硬膜外注射0.5%、0.75%、1.0%的罗哌卡因和0.5%的布比卡因进行双盲比较。

A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Finucane B T, Sandler A N, McKenna J, Reid D, Milner A L, Friedlander M, Muzyka D, O'Callaghan-Enright S, Chan V

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Alberta, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1996 May;43(5 Pt 1):442-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03018104.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ropivacaine is a new long-acting, injectable local anaesthetic currently undergoing clinical investigation world wide. It is structurally very similar to bupivacaine, but with less potential for central nervous system or cardiac toxicity. The purpose of this double-blind study was: to investigate the dose-response relationship of increasing doses of ropivacaine on the quality of anaesthesia and the duration of both motor and sensory blockade, and to compare these results with an established local anaesthetic, bupivacaine.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty five patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups and 116 completed the study. Epidural anaesthesia was established using 25 ml test solution, injected over three minutes following a satisfactory test dose. Sensory onset, spread and duration, using the pin prick method, and motor scores using a modified Bromage scoring system were compared.

RESULTS

A dose/response relationship was observed with increasing doses of ropivacaine for all variables tested except analgesia and muscle relaxation (P < 0.01). There were differences in: (i) motor onset (Levels 1 and 2), when ropivacaine 1.0% was compared with ropivacaine 0.75% and 0.5% (P < 0.05); (ii) in sensory duration at all levels except T6 when ropivacaine was compared with ropivacaine 0.5% (P < 0.05); (iii) differences in sensory duration at T12 and S1 when ropivacaine 1.0% was compared with bupivacaine 0.5% (P < 0.05); (iv) differences in motor duration at all levels when ropivacaine 1.0% was compared with ropivacaine 0.5% (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported in this study.

CONCLUSION

Increasing doses of ropivacaine were associated with an increased clinical effect. The most consistent differences occurred when ropivacaine 1.0% was compared with 0.5% and the least consistent between ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5%. The main difference between ropivacaine 1.0% and bupivacaine was in sensory duration. No serious adverse events were reported.

摘要

目的

罗哌卡因是一种新型长效可注射局部麻醉药,目前正在全球范围内进行临床研究。它在结构上与布比卡因非常相似,但中枢神经系统或心脏毒性较小。这项双盲研究的目的是:研究增加罗哌卡因剂量对麻醉质量以及运动和感觉阻滞持续时间的剂量 - 反应关系,并将这些结果与一种已确立的局部麻醉药布比卡因进行比较。

方法

125例患者被随机分配到四个治疗组之一,116例完成了研究。在给予满意的试验剂量后,于三分钟内注入25毫升试验溶液建立硬膜外麻醉。使用针刺法比较感觉起效、扩散和持续时间,并使用改良的布罗玛奇评分系统比较运动评分。

结果

除镇痛和肌肉松弛外,所有测试变量均观察到罗哌卡因剂量增加与反应的关系(P < 0.01)。存在以下差异:(i)当比较1.0%罗哌卡因与0.75%和0.5%罗哌卡因时,运动起效(1级和2级)有差异(P < 0.05);(ii)除T6外,在所有水平上比较罗哌卡因与0.5%罗哌卡因时,感觉持续时间有差异(P < 0.05);(iii)当比较1.0%罗哌卡因与0.5%布比卡因时,T12和S1水平的感觉持续时间有差异(P < 0.05);(iv)当比较1.0%罗哌卡因与0.5%罗哌卡因时,所有水平的运动持续时间有差异(P < 0.05)。本研究未报告严重不良事件。

结论

罗哌卡因剂量增加与临床效果增强相关。当比较1.0%罗哌卡因与0.5%罗哌卡因时,差异最一致;而在0.5%、0.75%罗哌卡因与0.5%布比卡因之间差异最不一致。1.0%罗哌卡因与布比卡因的主要区别在于感觉持续时间。未报告严重不良事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验