Bader A M, Datta S, Flanagan H, Covino B G
Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Anesth Analg. 1989 Jun;68(6):724-7.
Ropivacaine (LEA-103) is a new amino-amide local anesthetic agent the chemical structure and anesthetic properties of which are similar to bupivacaine. Preliminary studies in animals indicate that the CNS toxicities of ropivacaine and bupivacaine are similar, but that ropivacaine may have less arrhythmogenic effects than bupivacaine. The current study arrhythmogenic effects than bupivacaine. The current study was designed to compare the in vitro potency, onset and recovery from block of ropivacaine and bupivacaine using an isolated rabbit vagus nerve model. The effect of varying concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on the compound action potential of A and C nerve fibers was assessed to determine whether motor and sensory fibers have different sensitivities to the two agents. The results showed that the depressant effect of bupivacaine was 16% greater than that of ropivacaine on motor fibers, but only 3% greater on sensory fibers. An analysis of variance indicated that this was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.028). Thus, at the concentrations tested, ropivacaine appears to produce relatively less blockade of motor fibers than does bupivacaine but with similar sensory blockade. The onset of this difference became significant as early as five minutes after the drug exposure was begun. No significant differences in recovery times were observed.
罗哌卡因(LEA - 103)是一种新型的氨基酰胺类局部麻醉药,其化学结构和麻醉特性与布比卡因相似。动物初步研究表明,罗哌卡因和布比卡因的中枢神经系统毒性相似,但罗哌卡因的致心律失常作用可能比布比卡因小。本研究旨在使用离体兔迷走神经模型比较罗哌卡因和布比卡因的体外效能、阻滞起效和恢复情况。评估不同浓度的罗哌卡因和布比卡因对A和C神经纤维复合动作电位的影响,以确定运动纤维和感觉纤维对这两种药物的敏感性是否不同。结果显示,布比卡因对运动纤维的抑制作用比罗哌卡因大16%,但对感觉纤维仅大3%。方差分析表明,这是一个具有统计学意义的差异(P = 0.028)。因此,在所测试的浓度下,罗哌卡因对运动纤维的阻滞作用似乎比布比卡因相对较小,但感觉阻滞作用相似。这种差异在药物暴露开始后五分钟就已显著出现。未观察到恢复时间的显著差异。