Suppr超能文献

头孢布烯与阿莫西林治疗婴幼儿及儿童中耳积液的疗效比较。

Efficacy of ceftibuten compared with amoxicillin for otitis media with effusion in infants and children.

作者信息

Mandel E M, Casselbrant M L, Kurs-Lasky M, Bluestone C D

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2583, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 May;15(5):409-14. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199605000-00006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This trial compared the efficacy of ceftibuten with that of amoxicillin in resolving otitis media with effusion.

METHODS

Two hundred ten children with otitis media with effusion were randomly assigned to receive either ceftibuten (9 mg/kg/day in one daily dose) or amoxicillin (40 mg/kg/day divided into 3 daily doses) for 14 days. Outcome was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks in all subjects; those without middle ear effusion at the 4-week visit were examined at 8, 12 and 16 weeks. Middle ear status was determined by pneumatic otoscopy and by an algorithm combining pneumatic otoscopy with tympanometry.

RESULTS

The percentages of subjects who were effusion-free in the ceftibuten and amoxicillin groups at 2 weeks by otoscopy were 29.8 and 27.2%, respectively (P = 0.59), and by the algorithm, 23.4 and 20.4%, respectively (P = 0.47). In children who were effusion-free at 2 weeks, recurrence of effusion by 16 weeks was noted in approximately 60% of the ceftibuten group and 67% of the amoxicillin group. No medication side effects were reported by 88% of subjects in the ceftibuten group and by 93% of subjects in the amoxicillin group. We found no significant differences between the ceftibuten and amoxicillin groups with respect to resolution of middle ear effusion, rate of recurrence or side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Amoxicillin remains the drug of first choice for treatment of otitis media with effusion when treatment is deemed advisable, but ceftibuten may be an alternative drug in selected situations.

摘要

目的

本试验比较了头孢布烯与阿莫西林在治疗渗出性中耳炎方面的疗效。

方法

210名渗出性中耳炎患儿被随机分为两组,分别接受头孢布烯(9毫克/千克/天,每日一次)或阿莫西林(40毫克/千克/天,分3次服用)治疗,疗程为14天。所有受试者在2周和4周时进行疗效评估;4周复诊时无中耳积液的受试者在8周、12周和16周时再次接受检查。通过鼓气耳镜检查以及鼓气耳镜与鼓室导抗图相结合的算法来确定中耳状况。

结果

在2周时,通过耳镜检查,头孢布烯组和阿莫西林组中耳无积液的受试者百分比分别为29.8%和27.2%(P = 0.59),通过算法得出的百分比分别为23.4%和20.4%(P = 0.47)。在2周时中耳无积液的儿童中,头孢布烯组约60%以及阿莫西林组约67%的儿童在16周时出现了积液复发。头孢布烯组88%以及阿莫西林组93%的受试者未报告药物副作用。我们发现,在中耳积液的消退、复发率或副作用方面,头孢布烯组与阿莫西林组之间无显著差异。

结论

在认为有必要进行治疗时,阿莫西林仍是治疗渗出性中耳炎的首选药物,但在某些特定情况下,头孢布烯可能是一种替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验