Mandel E M, Casselbrant M L, Rockette H E, Bluestone C D, Kurs-Lasky M
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2583, USA.
Pediatrics. 1995 Jul;96(1 Pt 1):5-13.
The purpose of this trial was to determine whether 20 days of antimicrobial treatment is more efficacious than 10 days of treatment for acute otitis media (AOM) in clearing middle ear effusion and preventing recurrences of AOM, and whether changing to a beta-lactamase-stable antimicrobial agent after the initial 10-day treatment with amoxicillin for AOM is advantageous.
Children between 7 months and 12 years of age with AOM were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: (1) amoxicillin for days 1 through 10, then amoxicillin for days 11 through 20; (2) amoxicillin for days 1 through 10, then amoxicillin-clavulanate for days 11 through 20; and (3) amoxicillin for days 1 through 10, then a placebo for either amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate for days 11 through 20. Medication was dispensed in a double-blind manner. Children underwent tympanocentesis at entry and were re-examined on days 10, 20, 30, 60, and 90 after entry.
Two hundred sixty-seven children entered the trial. At the 20-day visit, the percentages of children who were effusion free in the amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and placebo groups were 72.4%, 80.8%, and 52.5%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of children who were effusion free between the amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate groups (95% confidence interval, -21.7, 4.9). Subsequent to the day 10 visit, the average proportions of time with middle ear effusion were not significantly different in the amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and placebo groups (0.29, 0.27, and 0.34, respectively), nor were there significant differences in the rates of recurrent episodes of AOM (0.56, 0.59, and 0.68, respectively). Regardless of treatment group, approximately 75% of children were effusion free at the time of their last visit.
More children were effusion free by the day 20 visit if given antimicrobial treatment for 20 days rather than for 10 days, but this advantage was present for only a short time; by the end of the 90-day study period, the treatment groups were comparable with regard to effusion status. Recurrence of AOM during the study period was not prevented by the additional 10 days of treatment. Routine use of an additional 10-day course of antimicrobial treatment is therefore not recommended if a child is symptom free after the initial 10 days of treatment for AOM.
本试验旨在确定针对急性中耳炎(AOM)进行20天抗菌治疗在清除中耳积液及预防AOM复发方面是否比10天治疗更有效,以及在最初用阿莫西林对AOM进行10天治疗后改用对β-内酰胺酶稳定的抗菌药物是否具有优势。
将7个月至12岁患有AOM的儿童随机分为三个治疗组:(1)第1天至第10天用阿莫西林,然后第11天至第20天用阿莫西林;(2)第1天至第10天用阿莫西林,然后第11天至第20天用阿莫西林-克拉维酸;(3)第1天至第10天用阿莫西林,然后第11天至第20天用阿莫西林或阿莫西林-克拉维酸的安慰剂。药物以双盲方式分发。儿童在入组时进行鼓膜穿刺术,并在入组后第10、20、30、60和90天进行复查。
267名儿童进入试验。在第20天访视时,阿莫西林组、阿莫西林-克拉维酸组和安慰剂组中耳无积液儿童的百分比分别为72.4%、80.8%和52.5%。阿莫西林组和阿莫西林-克拉维酸组中耳无积液儿童的百分比差异无统计学意义(95%置信区间,-21.7, 4.9)。在第10天访视之后,阿莫西林组、阿莫西林-克拉维酸组和安慰剂组中耳积液的平均时间比例差异无统计学意义(分别为0.29、0.27和0.34),AOM复发率也无显著差异(分别为0.56、0.59和0.68)。无论治疗组如何,约75%的儿童在最后一次访视时中耳无积液。
对于AOM,如果给予20天抗菌治疗而非10天治疗,到第20天访视时中耳无积液的儿童更多,但这种优势仅持续较短时间;到90天研究期结束时,各治疗组在积液状况方面相当。研究期间额外10天的治疗未能预防AOM复发。因此,如果儿童在AOM最初10天治疗后无症状,不建议常规使用额外10天疗程的抗菌治疗。