Bowers W J, Gingras M A, Amit Z
Dept. Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 May;125(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02247391.
Previous studies have shown that stressors attenuate LiCI-induced conditioned taste aversions (CTA) but not morphine-induced CTA. The current studies examined the effects of footshock on the acquisition and extinction of amphetamine-induced CTA. Experiment 1 demonstrated that exposure to 30 footshocks between saccharin consumption and amphetamine injections did not alter either the acquisition or the extinction of amphetamine-CTA. Experiment 2 demonstrated that exposure to the same shock parameters 2 and 4 days before saccharin-amphetamine pairing increased the magnitude of amphetamine-CTA after one saccharin-amphetamine pairing and delayed the recovery from the CTA. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that footshock increased the initial neophobic response to novel saccharin but did not alter subsequent saccharin consumption among saline-injected animals. These results indicate that stress-induced facilitation of amphetamine CTA are time-dependent and contrast with reports that stressors attenuate LiCI CTA. They also add support to the contention that CTAs induced by self-administered drugs like amphetamine are qualitatively different from CTAs induced by toxic substances like LiCL.
先前的研究表明,应激源会减弱氯化锂诱导的条件性味觉厌恶(CTA),但不会减弱吗啡诱导的CTA。当前的研究考察了足部电击对苯丙胺诱导的CTA习得和消退的影响。实验1表明,在摄入糖精和注射苯丙胺之间遭受30次足部电击,既不会改变苯丙胺CTA的习得,也不会改变其消退。实验2表明,在糖精-苯丙胺配对前2天和4天暴露于相同的电击参数,在一次糖精-苯丙胺配对后会增加苯丙胺CTA的程度,并延迟CTA的恢复。实验2还表明,足部电击增加了对新型糖精的初始新物回避反应,但在注射生理盐水的动物中并未改变随后的糖精摄入量。这些结果表明,应激诱导的苯丙胺CTA促进作用是时间依赖性的,这与应激源减弱氯化锂CTA的报道形成对比。它们还支持了这样的观点,即像苯丙胺这样的自我给药药物诱导的CTA与像氯化锂这样的有毒物质诱导的CTA在性质上是不同的。