Snyder B, Ryerson C C, Corona H, Grogan E A, Reynolds H S, Contestable P B, Boyer B P, Mayer J, Mangan T, Norkus N, Zambon J J, Genco R J
Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Periodontol. 1996 May;67(5):497-505. doi: 10.1902/jop.1996.67.5.497.
The analytical performance of a membrane-based immunoassay for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Prevotella intermedia (including Prevotella nigrescens) was investigated. Positive reactions were observed for 71 of 71 reference strains and recent oral isolates of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia. No cross-reactivity was observed with 39 other common oral and environmental species. The specificity of the test was unaffected by the presence of potential oral interferents including whole blood, white blood cells, mucin, saliva, toothpastes, and oral rinses. A proficiency test by dental professionals using a standardized set of unknown simulated samples yielded a sensitivity of 97% (116/120) and a 100% specificity (240/ 240). An additional group including dental professionals and high school students was shown to be 99% proficient (1385/1397) in distinguishing proper from improper test function when processing control samples with normal test devices and devices with simulated error conditions. Comparisons to a culture standard for 104 subgingival plaque samples collected from 26 adult periodontitis patients yielded > 98% specificity for each of the test bacteria. In addition, the detection threshold for the test was determined to be equivalent to 10(4) cultivable test bacteria when compared to the culture standard. The data indicate that this membrane immunoassay is a valid and easy-to-use method for the detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia in subgingival plaque, at levels above the detection threshold of the test.
研究了一种基于膜的免疫测定法同时检测和区分伴放线放线杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和中间普氏菌(包括变黑普氏菌)的分析性能。在71株伴放线放线杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和中间普氏菌的参考菌株及近期口腔分离株中,有71株出现阳性反应。与39种其他常见口腔和环境菌种未观察到交叉反应。该检测方法的特异性不受包括全血、白细胞、粘蛋白、唾液、牙膏和漱口水等潜在口腔干扰物的影响。牙科专业人员使用一组标准化的未知模拟样本进行的能力验证试验,灵敏度为97%(116/120),特异性为100%(240/240)。另一组包括牙科专业人员和高中生,在用正常检测设备和模拟错误条件的设备处理对照样本时,区分正确与错误检测功能的能力为99%(1385/1397)。对从26名成人牙周炎患者收集的104份龈下菌斑样本与培养标准进行比较,每种检测细菌的特异性均>98%。此外,与培养标准相比,该检测方法的检测阈值确定为相当于10(4)个可培养的检测细菌。数据表明,这种膜免疫测定法是一种有效且易于使用的方法,可用于检测龈下菌斑中高于检测阈值水平的伴放线放线杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和中间普氏菌。