Croce R, Horvat M, Roswal G
Department of Kinesiology, New Hampshire Hall, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824-3559, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Apr;82(2):507-14. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.2.507.
Coincident timing by individuals who exhibit traumatic brain injury was measured under conditions of no knowledge of results (no KR; n = 12), KR on every trial (n = 14), summary KR (n = 13), and average KR (n = 12). Following acquisition trials, groups performed immediate and longer retention trials without KR. Absolute constant error and variable error, analyzed in separate repeated-measures analyses of variance, indicated that during acquisition trials subjects receiving KR on every trial were the most accurate and the most consistent in their responses; however, subjects in groups receiving summary and average KR were the most accurate during immediate retention, with the group receiving summary KR being the most accurate during longer retention.
在对结果不知情（无结果反馈；n = 12）、每次试验均有结果反馈（n = 14）、总结性结果反馈（n = 13）以及平均结果反馈（n = 12）的条件下，对患有创伤性脑损伤的个体的同步计时进行了测量。在习得性试验之后，各小组在无结果反馈的情况下进行了即时和更长时间的保持性试验。在单独的重复测量方差分析中分析的绝对恒定误差和可变误差表明，在习得性试验期间，每次试验都接受结果反馈的受试者反应最准确且最一致；然而，接受总结性和平均结果反馈的小组在即时保持期间最准确，接受总结性结果反馈的小组在更长时间的保持期间最准确。
