Shen N, Zhu J
Department of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Hainan Province, Haikou, China.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996 Apr;12(3):153-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1006469.
Based on 191 follow-ups of patients with peripheral nerve injury and repair, the authors suggest that a reasonable assessment should consist of motor, sensory, and autonomic nerve indices. It is also suggested that a method of functional assessment about the autonomic nerve should be included. The method of evaluating motor function should be selected according to the site of the nerve injury. Lovett's method was adopted for nerve injury at the wrist and lower third of the forearm, as well as the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) method for nerve injury at the upper forearm or other nerves. Standards and grades of the BMRC should be raised somewhat, in order to compare more consistently with the results obtained using the method of Lovett; then both can be correlated satisfactorily.
基于对191例周围神经损伤与修复患者的随访，作者建议合理的评估应包括运动、感觉和自主神经指标。还建议应纳入一种自主神经功能评估方法。运动功能的评估方法应根据神经损伤部位选择。手腕和前臂下三分之一处的神经损伤采用洛维特方法，而上臂或其他神经的损伤采用英国医学研究委员会（BMRC）方法。应适当提高BMRC的标准和等级，以便与使用洛维特方法获得的结果更一致地进行比较；这样两者就能得到令人满意的关联。
