Suppr超能文献

软质颈托对挥鞭伤患者持续性颈部疼痛的影响。

The effect of soft cervical collars on persistent neck pain in patients with whiplash injury.

作者信息

Gennis P, Miller L, Gallagher E J, Giglio J, Carter W, Nathanson N

机构信息

Bronx Municipal Hospital Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(6):568-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03466.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of soft cervical collars in the early management of whiplash-injury-related pain.

METHODS

A controlled, clinical trial was conducted in an urban ED. Adults with neck pain following automobile crashes indicated their initial degrees of pain on a visual analog scale. Patients with cervical spine fractures or subluxation, focal neurologic deficits, or other major distracting injuries were excluded. Patients were assigned to receive a soft cervical collar or no collar based on their medical record numbers. Pain at > or = 6 weeks postinjury was coded as none, better, same, or worse, and analyzed as 3 dichotomous outcomes: recovered (pain = none); improved (pain = none or better); and deteriorated (pain = worse).

RESULTS

Of 250 patients enrolled, 196 (78%) were available for follow-up. Of these patients, 104 (53%) were assigned to the soft cervical collar group, and 92 (47%) to the control group. These groups were similar in age, gender, seat position in the car, seat belt use, and initial pain score. Pain persisted at > or = 6 weeks in 122 (62%) patients. The groups showed no difference in follow-up pain category (p = 0.59). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in complete recovery (p = 0.34), improvement (p = 0.34), or deterioration (p = 0.60). The study had a power of 80% to detect an absolute difference of at least 20% in recovery, 17% in improvement, and 7% in deterioration (2-tailed, alpha = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with whiplash injuries have persistent pain for at least 6 weeks. Soft cervical collars do not influence the duration or degree of persistent pain.

摘要

目的

评估软质颈托在挥鞭样损伤相关疼痛早期处理中的疗效。

方法

在一家城市急诊科进行了一项对照临床试验。汽车碰撞后颈部疼痛的成年人在视觉模拟量表上表明其初始疼痛程度。排除颈椎骨折或半脱位、局灶性神经功能缺损或其他严重干扰性损伤的患者。根据病历号将患者分配接受软质颈托或不接受颈托。伤后≥6周的疼痛被编码为无、好转、相同或恶化,并作为3个二分结果进行分析:恢复(疼痛=无);改善(疼痛=无或好转);以及恶化(疼痛=恶化)。

结果

在纳入的250例患者中,196例(78%)可进行随访。在这些患者中,104例(53%)被分配到软质颈托组,92例(47%)被分配到对照组。这些组在年龄、性别、车内座位位置、安全带使用情况和初始疼痛评分方面相似。122例(62%)患者伤后≥6周仍有疼痛。两组在随访疼痛类别上无差异(p = 0.59)。两组在完全恢复(p = 0.34)、改善(p = 0.34)或恶化(p = 0.60)方面无显著差异。该研究有80%的把握度检测到恢复方面至少20%、改善方面17%以及恶化方面7%的绝对差异(双侧,α = 0.05)。

结论

大多数挥鞭样损伤患者至少6周持续疼痛。软质颈托不影响持续疼痛的持续时间或程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验