Margolis R L, Harrison S A, Robinson H J, Jayaram G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-7463, USA.
Am J Occup Ther. 1996 May;50(5):380-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.50.5.380.
We designed a simple rating instrument, the Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS), to facilitate evaluation and documentation of patient performance during occupational therapy task groups and to improve the communication between occupational therapists and other treatment team members.
After analysis of other rating instruments, a preliminary version of OTTOS was designed, extensively field tested, and further modified. Interrater reliability was determined, and validity was tested against three established rating instruments: the Bay Area Functional Performance Evaluation, the Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale, and the Milwaukee Evaluation of Daily Living Skills.
The final version of OTTOS contains two parts, 10 items for evaluation of specific task functions and 5 items for rating general behavior. Field use demonstrated that the scale successfully tracked changes in functional capacity and included most facets of patient function evaluated during task groups. Use of OTTOS required minimal training, and scoring required less than 2 min for each patient. The correlation between the scores of experienced occupational therapists was high (.92 for the total scores). The correlation between OTTOS and the other rating instruments ranged from .880 to .340; the highest correlations, as expected, were with test subscales that most closely resembled OTTOS:
Preliminary data indicated that OTTOS offers a reliable and valid method for rapidly rating the function of patients with psychiatric illness attending task groups. In addition, use of OTTOS improved the communication between occupational therapists and other health care providers, facilitated the education of occupational therapy students, and met the documentation requirements of third-party payers.
我们设计了一种简单的评分工具——职业治疗任务观察量表(OTTOS),以促进对职业治疗任务组中患者表现的评估和记录,并改善职业治疗师与其他治疗团队成员之间的沟通。
在分析其他评分工具后,设计了OTTOS的初步版本,进行了广泛的现场测试,并进一步修改。确定了评分者间信度,并与三种已确立的评分工具进行了效度测试:湾区功能表现评估、综合职业治疗评估量表和密尔沃基日常生活技能评估。
OTTOS的最终版本包括两部分,10项用于评估特定任务功能,5项用于对一般行为进行评分。现场使用表明,该量表成功跟踪了功能能力的变化,并涵盖了任务组中评估的患者功能的大多数方面。使用OTTOS所需的培训极少,对每位患者评分所需时间不到2分钟。经验丰富的职业治疗师评分之间的相关性很高(总分相关性为0.92)。OTTOS与其他评分工具之间的相关性在0.880至0.340之间;正如预期的那样,与最类似于OTTOS的测试子量表的相关性最高:
初步数据表明,OTTOS为快速评估参加任务组的精神疾病患者的功能提供了一种可靠且有效的方法。此外,使用OTTOS改善了职业治疗师与其他医疗保健提供者之间的沟通,促进了职业治疗学生的教育,并满足了第三方付款人的记录要求。