Whitelaw F G, Nevin S L, Milne R M, Taylor R J, Taylor M W, Watt A H
Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen.
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):181-6.
A high proportion of Scottish general practices use a standard computer software package (GPASS, general practice administration system for Scotland), and thus, Scotland is uniquely placed to amalgamate primary care data on a national scale. Practices, however, vary widely in the nature and extent of data entered on computer and a major limitation on the use of the collected data is the absence of information on the completeness and accuracy of the computer database.
This study set out to assess the quality of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on computer by general practices in Scotland.
Forty-one practices, with above average levels of morbidity data recorded on computer, were selected on a geographic basis in relation to the national population distribution. Within each practice, 250 patients aged 45-64 years were selected at random. Data relating to 19 diagnoses, six surgical procedures and 40 repeat prescription drugs were extracted from the computer records of these patients and compared with information held on patients' paper records and supplied by patients in response to a postal questionnaire. The completeness and accuracy of computer entries were assessed in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value, respectively.
For the 5567 patients for whom all three sources of data (validated computer records, paper records and questionnaire responses) were available, sensitivity (completeness) of morbidity recording had median values of 0.67 for diagnoses, 0.93 for surgical procedures and 0.75 over all conditions examined. Practices varied both in the completeness of recording of each condition and in their overall performance. The predictive value (accuracy) of morbidity data was uniformly high for all conditions examined (median 1.00). For repeat prescription drugs, recording on GPASS was both complete and accurate.
The recording of morbidity data on GPASS for 45-64-year-old patients in a selected group of 41 highly-computerized practices is about 75% complete and highly accurate. For national morbidity studies, it seems likely that amalgamated data from the best GPASS practices will be as complete and accurate as the morbidity statistics currently derived from hospital-based activities in Scotland.
苏格兰很大一部分普通医疗诊所使用标准计算机软件包(GPASS,苏格兰普通医疗管理系统),因此,苏格兰在全国范围内整合初级保健数据方面具有独特优势。然而,各诊所在计算机录入数据的性质和程度上差异很大,使用所收集数据的一个主要限制是缺乏关于计算机数据库完整性和准确性的信息。
本研究旨在评估苏格兰普通医疗诊所在计算机上保存的发病率和重复开药记录的质量。
根据与全国人口分布相关的地理位置,选择了41个计算机记录的发病率数据高于平均水平的诊所。在每个诊所内,随机选择250名年龄在45至64岁之间的患者。从这些患者的计算机记录中提取与19种诊断、6种外科手术和40种重复处方药相关的数据,并与患者纸质记录上的信息以及患者通过邮政问卷提供的信息进行比较。分别从敏感性和阳性预测值方面评估计算机录入的完整性和准确性。
对于可获得所有三种数据来源(经过验证的计算机记录、纸质记录和问卷回复)的5567名患者,发病率记录的敏感性(完整性)在诊断方面中位数为0.67,外科手术方面为0.93,在所检查的所有情况中为0.75。各诊所在每种情况记录的完整性及其整体表现方面都存在差异。在所检查的所有情况中,发病率数据的预测值(准确性)均普遍较高(中位数为1.00)。对于重复处方药,GPASS上的记录既完整又准确。
在41个高度计算机化的诊所中,对45至64岁患者在GPASS上记录的发病率数据约75%完整且高度准确。对于全国发病率研究,来自最佳GPASS诊所的合并数据似乎可能与目前从苏格兰医院活动得出的发病率统计数据一样完整和准确。