Suppr超能文献

苏格兰全科医疗计算机中保存的发病率及重复开药记录的完整性和准确性。

Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.

作者信息

Whitelaw F G, Nevin S L, Milne R M, Taylor R J, Taylor M W, Watt A H

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):181-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high proportion of Scottish general practices use a standard computer software package (GPASS, general practice administration system for Scotland), and thus, Scotland is uniquely placed to amalgamate primary care data on a national scale. Practices, however, vary widely in the nature and extent of data entered on computer and a major limitation on the use of the collected data is the absence of information on the completeness and accuracy of the computer database.

AIM

This study set out to assess the quality of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on computer by general practices in Scotland.

METHOD

Forty-one practices, with above average levels of morbidity data recorded on computer, were selected on a geographic basis in relation to the national population distribution. Within each practice, 250 patients aged 45-64 years were selected at random. Data relating to 19 diagnoses, six surgical procedures and 40 repeat prescription drugs were extracted from the computer records of these patients and compared with information held on patients' paper records and supplied by patients in response to a postal questionnaire. The completeness and accuracy of computer entries were assessed in terms of sensitivity and positive predictive value, respectively.

RESULTS

For the 5567 patients for whom all three sources of data (validated computer records, paper records and questionnaire responses) were available, sensitivity (completeness) of morbidity recording had median values of 0.67 for diagnoses, 0.93 for surgical procedures and 0.75 over all conditions examined. Practices varied both in the completeness of recording of each condition and in their overall performance. The predictive value (accuracy) of morbidity data was uniformly high for all conditions examined (median 1.00). For repeat prescription drugs, recording on GPASS was both complete and accurate.

CONCLUSION

The recording of morbidity data on GPASS for 45-64-year-old patients in a selected group of 41 highly-computerized practices is about 75% complete and highly accurate. For national morbidity studies, it seems likely that amalgamated data from the best GPASS practices will be as complete and accurate as the morbidity statistics currently derived from hospital-based activities in Scotland.

摘要

背景

苏格兰很大一部分普通医疗诊所使用标准计算机软件包(GPASS,苏格兰普通医疗管理系统),因此,苏格兰在全国范围内整合初级保健数据方面具有独特优势。然而,各诊所在计算机录入数据的性质和程度上差异很大,使用所收集数据的一个主要限制是缺乏关于计算机数据库完整性和准确性的信息。

目的

本研究旨在评估苏格兰普通医疗诊所在计算机上保存的发病率和重复开药记录的质量。

方法

根据与全国人口分布相关的地理位置,选择了41个计算机记录的发病率数据高于平均水平的诊所。在每个诊所内,随机选择250名年龄在45至64岁之间的患者。从这些患者的计算机记录中提取与19种诊断、6种外科手术和40种重复处方药相关的数据,并与患者纸质记录上的信息以及患者通过邮政问卷提供的信息进行比较。分别从敏感性和阳性预测值方面评估计算机录入的完整性和准确性。

结果

对于可获得所有三种数据来源(经过验证的计算机记录、纸质记录和问卷回复)的5567名患者,发病率记录的敏感性(完整性)在诊断方面中位数为0.67,外科手术方面为0.93,在所检查的所有情况中为0.75。各诊所在每种情况记录的完整性及其整体表现方面都存在差异。在所检查的所有情况中,发病率数据的预测值(准确性)均普遍较高(中位数为1.00)。对于重复处方药,GPASS上的记录既完整又准确。

结论

在41个高度计算机化的诊所中,对45至64岁患者在GPASS上记录的发病率数据约75%完整且高度准确。对于全国发病率研究,来自最佳GPASS诊所的合并数据似乎可能与目前从苏格兰医院活动得出的发病率统计数据一样完整和准确。

相似文献

6
Health promotion and the use of Gpass in Scotland.
Health Bull (Edinb). 1995 Sep;53(5):253-9.
8
Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Nov;53(496):838-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality of electronic medical records in academic hospitals: A multi-center study in Iran.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 23;4:856010. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.856010. eCollection 2022.
2
Inconsistency in prevalence of hypertension based on self-reports and use of standard tests: Implications for large scale surveys.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Oct 3;19:101255. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101255. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Application of openEHR archetypes to automate data quality rules for electronic health records: a case study.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Apr 3;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01481-2.
7
The validity of dementia diagnoses in routinely collected electronic health records in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):244-255. doi: 10.1002/pds.4669. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Read Codes Version 3: a user led terminology.
Methods Inf Med. 1995 Mar;34(1-2):187-92.
2
Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.
BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102.
3
Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552.
5
The Delphi technique: a critique.
J Adv Nurs. 1987 Nov;12(6):729-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x.
6
A system for general practice computing in Scotland.
Health Bull (Edinb). 1989 May;47(3):110-9.
7
General practice computing in Scotland.
BMJ. 1990 Jan 20;300(6718):170-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.170.
10
How accurate are SMR1 (Scottish Morbidity Record 1) data?
Health Bull (Edinb). 1992 Jan;50(1):14-23; discussion 29-31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验